The. article includes
, a female face and an
X-ray contour map e the mandible. He discussed the ES ERE of
these measurements for various dental, genetic and Psy ychological
purposes. Independently, (i.e. apparently without any help from Savara),
Mikhai T REIS and Roger (1966) of the Civil Engineering Department,
M University, undertook a collaborative study with two dentists, a
psychologist and a statistical specialist in genetics. They explored the
feasibility of using photogrammetry, both analog and analytical for
measuring dental casts in genetic research. With admirable objectivity,
they discarded the idea of using a traditional stereophotogrammetric
approach and proposed an alternative non-photogrammetric method
based on direct stereometric analysis of the casts.
surface of the did Mis Hoppe) ry.
contour maps of a firs "pn e-molar, the lower teeth
Using modified Honeywell Pentax cameras, Heinz Gruner of Bausch
& Lomb in collaboration with faculty members of the Eastman Dental
Center in Rochester, New York, developed a photogrammetric system
for dental surgery. Several papers (Gruner, 1967; Gruner, Zulquar-nain
and Zander, 1967; Zulquar-nain, Burgess and Zander, 1967; Burgess and
Zulquar-nain, 1968; and Gruner, 1970) have resulted from this
collaboration. The prime objective was to obtain reliable
three-dimensional measurements of the human oral cavity to determine
and clinically control changes in teeth configuration and gum and bone
tissues before and after surgery. The results showed agreement between
model orientations “well within the toleration of 0.5 mm at the model
scale" and elevation measurements "better than a 0.1 mm tolerance
specified at the natural object scale (Gruner 1970)." They emphasized
that the work was aided considerably by using a re-usable individual
control pattern for each patient.
Further research by McGivern of Bausch & Lomb and Eick and
Sorensen of the School of Dentistry, State University of New York at
Buffalo has led to ftinroveintens in the Bausch & Lomb-Honeywell
Pentax stereocamera system. They reduced the object conjugate by half
which doubled the negative and model scales. Although this
modification presented several optical, mechanical and operational
problems, they described how these difficulties were surmounted
(McGivern, Eick and Sorensen, 1971). Based on a series of tests, they
concluded that the new system is capable of distinguishing the
difference in height at various positions on the tooth and tooth
restorations to within 50 micrometers at the 95% confidence level.
By moving the model between exposures, Berkowitz and Pruzansky
(1968) obtained stereopairs of cleft palate casts with a single camera as
Savara (1965) had done a few years earlier. With a Galileo-Santoni
stereoplotter they compiled detailed contour maps showing serial
topographic changes in the palatal vault——which is of special interest
because it can affect tongue posture. They aiso used contour maps to
p —— MÀ —
/