XIII Congress of the
International Society for Photogrammetry
Helsinki, 1976
Commission V
Working Group Vll
Invited Paper
PH. HOTTIER
Institut Geographique National
Paris, France
Accuracy of Close-Range
Analytical Restitutions: Practical
Experiments and Prediction
The distinction between precision and accuracy; the
prediction of accuracy; and the effects of measurement
redundance, geometry, and the use of non-metric cameras
are discussed.
INTRODUCTION
( A PHOTOGRAMMETRY does not consider large object distance such as in aerial
photogrammetry, which involves the problems of refraction, but only the range 0 to 200
meters.
This report is limited to analytical restitutions, because analog restitutions are now being
employed to a lesser degree in precision civil engineering applications due to the lower
(likely 3 to 5 times) accuracy and also to the strict geometry conditions (only the normal case
can be used on the modern analog stereoplotters). Nevertheless, in my opinion it also would
be interesting to conduct similar studies for analog or semi-analytical restitutions.
One may wonder why so general a problem has not been exhaustively treated in the past.
The principal reason was probably the lack of civil engineering applications, the develop-
ment of which is recent. There was no necessity to compare photogrammetric accuracy with
the accuracy of other metric techniques, and to produce in this particular area efficient
criteria and predictors of accuracy. Another reason is the multiplicity of parameters
(geometry, physical characteristics of the photogrammetric system, redundance of the
measurements) to be considered, and the necessity to conduct numerous and costly
experiments.
ACCURACY AND PRECISION
The two concepts (accuracy and precision) should be carefully distinguished.* Let X be
the true value of some physical quantity, and X an estimation of X based upon a particular
measuring system S (X included in S). One always states a difference between the
expectation of E,X of X within the measuring system and X:
EX-TX
Then we define the error of X as follows:
em? anak mE RA ER wer
where
* ISP Commission VI 1964 Glossary of some terms and expressions in the theory of errors.
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING,
Vol. 42, No. 3, March 1976, pp. 345-375.