Martin,J. and McClure,C.,1985. Diagramming Techniques 
for Analysts and Programmers. Prentice-Hall Inc. Engle- 
wood Cliffs, New Jersey. 
McRae,S.D.,1989. GIS Design and the Questions Users 
should be asking. GIS/LIS Proceedings, Orlando, Florida, 
November 26'"-30"", vol.2,pp.528-537. 
Mittra,S.S.,1988. Structured Techniques of System 
Analysis, Design and Implementation. John Wiley and 
Sons, New York. 
Modha,J., Gwinnett,A. and Bruce,M.,1990. A Review of 
Information Systems Development Methodology (ISDM) 
Selection Techniques. OMEGA International Journal of 
Management Science,vol. 18,No.5,pp.473-490. 
Naumann,J. and Palvia,S.,1982. A Selection Model for 
Systems Development Tools. MIS Quarterly / March, pp.39- 
47. 
Olle,T.W. et al.,1991. Information Systems Methodologies: 
A Framework for Understanding (2nd.Ed.). Addison- 
Wesley, England. 
Paresi,C.,1991. Introduction to Information System 
Development. ITC Lecture Notes Series. 
Radwan,M.M.(Undated). Digital Mapping and Topographic 
Databases. ITC Lecture notes. 
Slooten,K. van.,1992. A Multi-Level Approach for the 
Analysis and Design Process. Proceedings MOACSI, 
Nonkes, Sept. 
Stamper,R. and Kolkman,M.,1991. Problem Articulation: 
A Sharp-Edged Soft Systems Approach.Journal of Applied 
Information Systems,vol.18,pp.69-76. 
Stamper,R.,1992. The Parallel Development of Laws and 
their related Information Systems. University of Twente, 
The Netherlands. 
Ward,P.T.,1984. Systems Development Without Pain: A 
User's Guide to Modelling Organisational Patterns. Yourdon 
Press, New Jersey. 
Yourdon,E.,1988. Managing the System Life Cycle. (2nd 
Edition) Yourdon Press, New Jersey. 
  
ABSTR 
The u 
e 
N 
I 
N 
w 
6 AND 7 8 data 
RATING OF | and € 
CRITERIA tiona 
(RCk) 2 
No their 
9 -- Propision advan 
27 rec force 
3 -- Good ] 
4 -- V. Good videl 
5 -- Ecxellent of th 
012345 and ] 
Cl Wi* RGI Major 
C2 W1* RC2 datio 
C3 W1* RC3 
Ck W1* RCk mzzxxxxmm KEY W 
Wp1 ‘ 
F2 wa infor 
  
  
WEIGHTS 
WEIGHTS 
CONTINGENCY 
= Rfi 
Pn 
) Rp 
Pi 
MODEL 
) WPa*Rfi 
Fi 
F1 
Total Weighted Rating 
Per Meth. / Tech. 
RT = 
Wi * Rck 
WEIGHTED RATING 
Ck 
Rü- ) wi*Rck 
C1 
Total Weighted Rating 
(CRITERIA) 
  
ACTIVITIES 
Wp |& FUNCTIONS Wi 
Object System Phases 
Per Function (F1) 
Per Phase 
Total Weighted Rating 
Rp = 
  
F1 W1 
  
DESIGN 
  
F3 W3 
Fi Wi 
  
  
  
Wp2 In tl 
the 1 
Group 
Produ 
syste 
discu 
those 
| refer 
APPENDIX 1: The Evaluation Matrix per Methodology/Technique per Evaluator (for steps 0 through 8). Steps 4 and 5 | spati 
are under Organisational Constraints. Of I 
sensi 
photo 
produ 
photo 
terra 
Likew 
sense 
Analy 
thema 
With 
Syste 
IMPLEMEN- 
TATION 
  
  
  
Wpa | 
  
  
  
OPERA- 
TIONS 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
266