COMPARISON. OF MEASUREMENTS Appendix I 
(metres) OY 
VIL 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
N S W E MA 
Survcy : 
No REMARKS : 
: ——— 
Ground| Photo Ground| Photo Ground| Photo (Ground| Photo 
| DOR N 
l 784 |-755 68.4 67.8 11 39.0 9.0 56.0 57.4 North-castern corner point is not em 
14.4 12.6 well-identifiablc. 
20.4 22.6 / 
2 68.4 67.7 53.8 54.4 15.6 19.6 49.() 49.1 Total length of western side agrees 
29.6 24.2 4.8 39 
3. 38.2 38.0 24.8 27.0 49.0 492 | 110.4 | 1098 | Total length; intermediate posi- 
56.0 57.4 tions nol correctly identifiable, 
4. 37.2 363 8.2 8.0 39.8 39.5 34.8 — Sastern points could not be 
21.4 212 7.6 - correctly identified. 
5. 28.0 27.0 372 36.6 29.0 -- 5.6 5.9 -do- 
18.6 19.0 12.2 14.6 8.0 8.7 | Total length of Eastern side agrees 
24.2 224 
12.2 13.9 
6. 24.6 24.8 28.0 27.0 41.6 -- 40.8 41.1 western endpoints could not be 
located correctly. 
7. 17.4 173 18.6 19.2 40.8 -- 33.0 -- NW corner could not be located 
14.2 -- correctly. Intermediate point on 
the Eastern side could not be lo 
cated correctly. 
31 14.4 14.2 13.8 14.3 54.0 $4.2 338 MEO z $i 
3.8 4.0) 29.4 299}. | 
32 15.6 16.2 25,2 252 20.4 29.9 29.6 29.6 z [AM 
14471 132]. 258907 48 POIN 
l 
47 252 25.0 20.2 18.9 33.8 33.5 33.8 32.7 -- 2 
5.6 6.0 3 
48 25.6 -- 23.6 -- 29:0 28.9 18.0 18.1 Positions of Western endpoints 4 
13.8 14.3 25.0 27.0 are different on photo from 5 
20:2 18.5 ground, 5 
7 
  
320