Y 
NDINGS 
lifferent kind, 
wing subjects 
hood" of the 
ation in order 
uously being 
UR 
he coast and 
lief appears. 
the city are 
nage and the 
ents-cultural 
ments are of 
amiliar with 
nat there are 
essaloniki as 
its, christian 
opoulos A., 
lization map 
used on. 
of IKONOS 
These are 
n-Sharpened 
‘the 1-meter 
the 4-meter 
at first. On a 
its and their 
n resulted, 
; of different 
vns, internal 
© 
300 \ 
300 
Si 
v 
N 
Figure 1. Basic topographic data from map 1:250,000 for the city of Thessaloniki (---) and for the study area (...). 
As regards monuments information concerned: general form (as 
permitted from vertical observation), grade of ruin, land uses in 
the monuments’ environment and general status from the point 
of organization and distinction of the monument in its 
environment. We refer mainly to the monuments with numbers 
1-29 of Fig. 2, which are the following: 1. Eptapyrgio, 2. 
Trigonion or Alysos Tower, 3. Vlattades Monastery, 4. 
Taxiarhon church, 5. Ag. Ekaterinis church, 6. Prophiti Ilia 
church, 7. Ag. Nikolaos Orphanos church, 8. Laodigitria church, 
9. Aladja Imaret Djami, 10. Ag. Dimitrios church, 11. Ag. 
Apostolon church, 12. Roman Forum, 13. Ag. Panteleimonas 
church, 14. Rotonda, 15. Galerius Arch of Triumph (Kamara), 
16. Ag. Athanasios church, 17. Acheropoietos church, 18. Bey 
Hamam, 19. Panagias Chalkeon church, 20. Bezesteni, 21. Ag. 
Minas church, 22. Agias Sofias church, 23. Panagouda church, 
24. Metamorphoseos Sotiros church, 25. Ipapantis church, 26. 
Hippodrome, 27. Palace of Galerius (Roman palace), 28. Nea 
Panagia church, 29. White Tower. 
Relatively to the mentioned observations above, we present the 
example of Fig. 3 that concerns Agia Sofia church and its wide 
surroundings. 
-447—