ide it possible
th an ordinary
ual site, using
nost any given
)0, our digital
the calibration
cm, extremely
en for the non-
ith much ease.
nd its software
lity to make
calibration by
this fixed focal
d analyze. For
ding condition,
or high quality
e often obliged
ze of the object
calibration all
re, we have
and confirmed
ton and 3D
cm.
to explain DC-
pability and the
In this test we
1aeological ruin.
LIBRATION
ylotter based on
nage for digital
)00).
the system for
DI-1000 in our
Figure 2. Camera network
To operate the DC-1000 system, we first print out a flat sheet
(Figure 2) by a printer or plotter or display the same target
pattern on the Liquid Crystal Display (LCD monitor: Figure 3).
But if we use LCD monitor we can even work out the
calibration single-handedly with only a digital camera and a
notebook computer at hand.
For the present experimentation, we used a digital camera of
Minolta Dimage7, which has 4,950,000 pixels as in Figure 4
and its specifications as in Table 1. This time since we used a
digital camera with wide angle, we worked on a flat sheet of A1
size. But with the recent development of larger screen of LCD
monitor, such restriction will soon be gone.
Figure 4. Dimage7
Figure 3. Target on LCD monitor
CCD 2/3-type interline primary-color CCD
Number of pixels 4.95 million pixels (2568x1928)
Lens construction 16 elements in 13 groups; include 2 AD
glass elements and 2 aspheric elements
Maximum aperture f/2.8 — f/3.5
Focal length 7.2mm ~ 50.8mm (equivalent to 28-
200mm in 35 mm format) ~
Price About $1,200 ~
Table 1. Dimage7 Specifications
2.1 Analysis by Flat Sheet
When we make calibration not by the 3D Target-field measured
with precision but by a flat sheet, we can obtain the lens-
distortion value without difficulty but not the precise focal
length necessary for 3D measurement.
Tan C (Central point) AD C BE
i
n Camera distance iu
sf.
=
:
comes position 2
(a) (b) (c) (d)
Figure 5. Flat Sheet as being photographed
So, as explained below, we take picture of the sheet from 5
different positions, each with the difference of the angle of 15
degree.
As there are 5 points each highlighted by a square (or circle or
anything) on a sheet, first we take a picture of the sheet in such
a way that the entire sheet would just fill the entire screen of the
camera with the central point right at the center of the screen
(Figure 5(a)).
Hereby the distance between camera and object (hereafter:
camera distance) H is determined in function with the focal
length.
Second, we take a picture of each of the other four points in
each corner in the following way.
Suppose we choose the point *A" in upper left corner of the
sheet. Keeping the same camera distance H vis-a-vis the flat
sheet (or on the imaginary plane extending parallel to the sheet),
we move the camera from the position at which we have taken
the first picture towards the point *A" about 1/3 of the camera
distance “H”, if the H is more than 1m (Figure 5(b)). If the H is
less than 1m, we move the camera from the first position (which
is right above “C”) towards “A” till it gets right above the point
«AT.
Next aiming at "A" right in the center of the screen, and
keeping the camera at the same position, we turn the camera
towards "C" (Figure 5(c)) and now put *C" in the center. Then
always aiming at "C" right in the center of the screen, we
approach the camera towards the sheet until the entire flat sheet
would just fill.the entire screen of the camera (Figure 5(d)).
And click the shutter.
We do the same procedure for “B”, “D” and *E".
On this sheet there are 145 control points. We can calculate the
position of all of them through the projective transformation
from the highlighted points (A, B, C, D, E).
And then we can obtain the position of all control points with
sub-pixel precision through automatic measurement.
This enables us to establish the camera's interior orientation
parameters (principal point, focal length and lens distortion) by
self-calibrating bundle adjustment. This even enables us to
visualize the distortion before and after the correction on the
matrix of correction and ultimate ideal form.
—55—