h (mJ Fig. 1: Profile and prediction errors of Bohuslaen
18.
18.
14.
12.
10.
24.
20.
18.
12.
e [m]
2.0
1.0
0.0
| MAE i
7
250 m 500 m ; 750 m
. it .
-i* am am a t. + * erry? wre . M^ ° . ..*
. M ns AMAT Ne ttn —o —Ó 4 M
Fig. 2: Profile and prediction errors-of Uppland
250 m 500 m 750 m
+ . . * Tu .
ra - “ a —] ^ —, — t MA tnt yv Pme» -
« . . . y
- Mg -