116
Ti
NOW t:
will «
Grou
ing €
photc
Grou
Th
and €
ever,
Work
cerne
pretei
Dr
Work
Euroj
simpl
receiv
photo
partic
have
pared
cause
photo
where
used 1
histor
Th
ed thi
read :
by tit
preset
held
today.
Ou
Samu:
physic
Michi
graph
as a cC
has se
BOUSKY
It is considered as self-evident that the aspect of real importance
in the interpretation of recorded detail lies with the characteristics of
the ground detail itself. It will be useful, therefore, to examine some
basic characteristics of the ground image from this standpoint. The
three to be considered here are:
(1) The size of detail and detail patterns on the ground
(2) The contrast of this detail
(3) The illumination range
DETAIL SIZE
The photo-interpreter often uses the criterion of SCALE as indica-
his ability to identify certain detail types, keys, patterns, Or
is actually a term that repre-
It is defined as the ratio of
tive of
configuration sizes on the ground. Scale
sents the photographic magnification.
distance on the photograph to the actual distance on the ground. But
to many photo-interpreters who have been in the practice of evaluating
photographs of a standardized format size with an unintentionally
¢¢standardized’’ poor quality, scale has gained a significance in terms
of interpretability never anticipated by its definition. Even though the
present photographic quality may be vastly improved over that of his
past experience, and even though this improvement will provide him
with more recorded information and better interpretability, the photo-
oneously specify what he thinks he wants in
interpreter may still err
ize on
terms of scale rather than in terms of what he has to recogn
the ground.
A more fundamental parameter influencing the recognition of ground
detail is the actual size of the detail on the ground, since this is not
affected by variable standards of photographic quality. The sizes of
detail involved in interpretation of aerial photography may be con-
veniently categorized into six basic groups in terms of detail size.
These are indicated in Figure 1. The class divisions are made on the
basis of lineal detail dimensions in feet, and are based upon minimum,
or threshold, recognizable detail sizes on the ground. Such class
groups are both useful and significant in appraising photographic sys-
tems and missions. The nominal object sizes are convenient for group
range identification whether recorded at an altitude of 1,000 feet or
1,000 miles.
Generally, the 500 and 200 foot classes are primarily useful for
while the smaller sizes are most significant for
cartographic purposes,
e is appreciable over-
detail reconnaissance, although, of course, ther
lapping. For military use, other class names are used and other kinds
of detail may be important, Those listed in Figure 1 are primarily to
present the pattern of class distinction and are to be considered only
AT
Maru:
Archives