Full text: XIXth congress (Part B1)

  
By using this 
1. The surface 
IS. 
itinely used. In 
green channel, 
r detecting oil 
nd 780 nm are 
ut this task.) 
red and NIR). 
ments in these 
or climatically 
termination of 
ese parameters 
and hence the 
e calculated by 
ters mentioned 
lentification of 
early warnings 
issified (Hahn, 
istries dealing 
im to 1000 nm 
m mixed gases 
jicted. In order 
sitioned within 
s occurs. In the 
types of cloud 
es (right) 
ater areas or at 
nd is important 
im of the green 
located in this 
side of the red 
nnel. Since the 
n the software 
and centred at 
concentrated in 
this channel is 
  
  
Ralf Reulke 
required for identifying vegetation. The channel is located in the strong rise (red edge) of the reflectance curve for 
green vegetation 
e channel 5 - NIR: 870 nm +/-35 nm. In the ADS40 this channel has not been implemented. The disadvantage of this 
channel is the wide shape of the point spread function. Hence, the spatial resolution in this channel is no longer the 
same as in the red one. But this channel is necessary for some applications in retrieving plant parameters. Hence it 
follows that over heterogeneous areas channel 4 should be used instead of channel 5. 
Table 2. summarises the values for the selected channels and their main characteristics for the user. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Channel Centre Comments Characteristics 
Wavelength A, [nm] 
Blue 460 Pure CCD water (maximum absorption) 
sensitivity maximum light scattering 
oil (with NIR) 
RGB 
Green 560 water, vegetation 
(green reflectance peak) 
RGB 
Red 635 discrimination of vegetation (with 
NIR) 
RGB 
NIR 1 730 Balance between | discrimination of vegetation 
H,Op + CCD determination of biomass 
vegetation - state of health 
Broad Point mapping shorelines 
Spread Function | discrimination of vegetation and soil 
(PSF) pavement 
NIR 2 860 Broad PSF 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 2. Selected channels and their main characteristics 
32  Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) — Calculation for ADS40 Spectral Channels 
This calculation is mainly focused on the signal in relation to the camera and Poisson noise. In this case the signal 
estimation can be reduced on the calculation of the number of generated electrons: 
A 
n tig —-cos* 0 | dà R@)-TU)- L(A) (1) 
4k ~ 
Ao 
L is the radiance in front of the sensor, 7, the integration time (1 ms), k the f/4 of the optics, cos“ the shading of the 
optical system, T the transmittance of the optical system and R the responsivity of the detector element. The calculation 
was made with the following parameters. The detector size is A=6.5%6.5 um”. The spectral range is defined by table 2. 
The ADS40 optics have an f/# = 4. The noise of the electrical channel in electrons is rms=150 €. The radiance in front 
of the sensor was calculated with the 6S program (Vermote ef al., 1996). The results are obtained with a mid-latitude 
summer model, an urban aerosol model, visibility 23 km, solar zenith angle 30°, and nadir view angle. Test targets are 
vegetation, sand and lake water. Table 3 shows the results of the calculation. The calculation indicates a reasonable 
signal-to-noise ratio for all spectral channels. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Centre |FWHM | Vegetation | SNR| Sand | SNR |Water| SNR 
Wavelength 
0.46 0.06 17504 43 8055 46 16526 [38 
0.56 0.05 8547 48 0191 I 6307 [37 
0.635 0.05 5770 34 11369 61 5576 133 
0.73 0.05 27332 122 114122 !73 [3242 bo 
0.86 0.05 31147 134 117068 [85 1585 10 
PAN 94567 276 81490 252 441458 1163 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 3. Generated electrons and SNR for different test targets 
  
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part Bl. Amsterdam 2000. 247 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.