Itions of
sifiction
between
On tests
ere done
Vas used
of each
Ty gives
; the one
textures.
peration
| data of
tatistical
] texture
ach on à
eneities
. Signal
Vision
Stephane Paquis
Haddon, J. and Boyce, J., 1990. Unification of image segmentation and edge detection. IEE Proceedings 137(3), pp. 129—
135.
Haralick, R., Lin, C., Lee, J. and Zhuang, X., 1987. Multiresolution morphology. International Conference on Computer
Vision pp. 516-520.
Houzelle, S. and Giraudon, G., 199]. Segmentation using cooccurrence matrix modelisation. In: AFCET, 8àme congrés
de reconnaissance des formes et intelligences artificielles, Vol. 3, pp. 1177-1183.
Konik, H., Laget, B. and Calonnier, M., 1993. Segmentation d'images par utilisation de pyramides à bases locales.
Traitement du Signal 10(4), pp. 283-295.
Paquis, S., Legeay, V., Konik, H. and Charrier, J., 1999. Multiresolution texture analysis applied to road surface inspection.
SPIE 3652, pp. 242-249.
Rosenfeld, A. and Sher, A., 1988. Detection and delineation of compact objects using intensity pyramids. Pattern
Recognition 21(2), pp. 147-151.
Rouquet, C., Bonton, P. and Tomczak, R., 1998. Etude comparative de segmentation non supervisée en régions par
champs de Markov. Traitement du Signal 15(1), pp. 39—55.
Rouquet, C., Chausse, E., Chapuis, R. and Bonton, P., 1996. Segmentation non supervisée d'images de scenes routiéres.
Une approche multi-critére. Traitement du Signal 13(3), pp. pp 195-208.
Segall, C., Chen, W. and Acton, S., 1999. Video tracking using morphological pyramids. Journal of Electronic Imaging
8(2), pp. 176-184.
Serra, J., 1988. Image analysis and mathematical morphology. Vol. 1, 2nd edn, Academic Press.
Toet, A., 1989. A morphological pyramidal image decomposition. Pattern Recognition 9, pp. 255-261.
Tremeau, A., Bousigue, J. and Laget, B., 1996. Cooccurrence shape descriptors applied to texture classification and
segmentation. SPIE 2665, pp. 135-147.
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B3. Amsterdam 2000. 691