Full text: XIXth congress (Part B5,1)

  
Boehm, Jan 
  
AUTOMATED EXTRACTION OF FEATURES FROM CAD MODELS FOR 3D OBJECT 
RECOGNITION 
Jan BÖHM, Claus BRENNER, Jens GÜHRING, Dieter FRITSCH 
Institute for Photogrammetry (ifp), Stuttgart University 
Geschwister-Scholl-Strasse 24D, D-70174 Stuttgart 
Jan.Boehm@ifp.uni-stuttgart.de 
KEY WORDS: Object recognition, CAD, Modeling, Feature extraction 
ABSTRACT 
In this paper we report on our work on a CAD model-based object recognition system for industrial parts. We present 
à novel approach which uses information derived from the CAD model in the early process of range image segmenta- 
tion. This approach gives an exact classification of the range image enabling the development of a CAD based object 
recognition system. We describe the feature extraction from CAD data and its use in the curvature based range im- 
age classification. We carried out experiments with data from multiple sources. The results obtained are presented and 
discussed. 
1 INTRODUCTION 
Our work is part of a large scale research project on optical measurement using sensor actor coupling and active ex- 
ploration. This project is a collaboration of researchers from seven institutes of the University of Stuttgart including 
mechanical engineers, electrical engineers and computer scientists. The goal of our work is to implement a measurement 
system flexible enough to handle a large variety of objects from the industrial world. Using different types of sensors, e. g. 
Mono cameras, stereo cameras and stripe projection systems, the measurement process is automatically tailored towards 
the object presented to the system and measurement tasks specific to the object are executed. A CAD model for each 
object forms the basis for measurement planning and assessment. Since we allow the objects to be presented to the system 
in arbitrary position, one of the first steps of the measurement process has to be object recognition determining the pose 
of the object. For our work we use 3D data, so called range images, as sensor input. 
The task of object recognition can be formalized as follows: Finding the correspondence of features f; from the scene 
S = (fi, fo, fn} With features F; from the model M = UA F5, ..., F4). The collection of features [5 D5 Fa} 
form the description of the model. Model building by hand is a tedious and time consuming task which is also missing 
repeatability and is therefore unacceptable in an industrial environment. In our framework a CAD model is a 
vailable for 
each measured object. Therefore it is evident that the model used for object recognition should be automatically derived 
from CAD data. 
In the past, several model-based object recognition systems for range ima 
review can be found in (Arman and Aggarwal, 1993). Many of the systems 
example, some systems were able to detect cylindrical objects, 
edges which restricted them to polyhedral objects. In 
shape, including rounded edges and free-form surfaces. 
the fact that explicit three-dimensional CAD models are 
not be used directly for object recognition, since it is o 
ges have been reported. A comprehensive 
rely on the presence of specific features. For 
others were designed to handle planar surfaces with sharp 
our context we are required to handle industrial parts of complex 
Object recognition for industrial parts is a pretentious task, despite 
available. One reason for this is that CAD models may in general 
ften impossible to extract CAD specific high-level features from 
eeded which forms the interface between CAD representation and 
features which can be extracted from sensor data. In the work we present here, the CAD model is broken down into single 
Segmentation or feature extraction of range images has been a popular research topic for the 
have been developed including clustering, region growing and split and merge, see also ( 
problems became evident concerning reliability and curved surfaces. 
with the segmentation of polyhedral objects using region growing (B 
the edges of planar surfaces to terminate the growing of a region. Th 
is also not extendible to arbitrary shaped objects. 
past years. Several techniques 
Hoover et al., 1996). But also 
In our previous work we have obtained good results 
óhm et al., 1999), However, this approach relies on 
  
76 International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B5. Amsterdam 2000. 
Segment: 
mum nur 
of the rai 
need a fe 
surfaces 
shadowir 
is bound 
from infc 
We prope 
has the p 
the fund: 
point acc 
model sp 
we alreac 
Flynn an 
planar, s 
eithera p 
Surface « 
most wol 
a methoc 
that adva 
use an ex 
the CAD 
shown be 
While th 
previous] 
can be cc 
2 DER 
In this we 
system h 
system re 
While th 
shows th 
A CAD 1 
impleme 
type and 
Mean an 
footprint 
Le. the n 
For exan 
curvature 
During it 
paramete
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.