nd GIS :
Ipport in
cation of
Vienna :
ire Note
erlands :
e, HW,
papyrus
rimental
ns. The
» of Los
[M data
national
- 136.
Bertens, Jurjen
HYDROLOGICAL MODELS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS OF
INFRASTRUCTURE ON WATER-DRIVEN GEOMORPHOLOGICAL PROCESSES
Jurjen BERTENS', Paxti TAMÉS”. Antonio CENDRERO), Theo VAN ASCH*
! Universiteit Utrecht, the Netherlands
bertens] ? ccaix3.unican.es
? Diputación Foral de Guipuzcoa, San Sebastian, Spain
ptames @obrahitr.gipuzkoa.net
? Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
cendrera Q ccaix3.unican.es
^ Universiteit Utrecht, the Netherlands
T.vanAsch@frw.ruu.nl
Working Group: TC VII-8
KEY WORDS: Predictive modelling, watersheds, dynamic processes, erosion, land cover, soil conservation.
ABSTRACT
The construction of roads and motorways implies a variety of environmental impacts on landscape features. Some of those
features are essentially static and impacts on them can be assessed using straight-forward methods. However, impacts on
dynamic landscape features will have to be evaluated in other ways, since the impact itself will also be of a dynamic nature.
Fundamental to the geomorphological impact of any construction is the way in which hydrology is affected. Changes
imposed upon the landscape by road construction and use will affect mechanisms such as infiltration, runoff and erosion.
These impacts cannot be assessed directly, due to the complexity of hydrological processes and the way in which the
processes are interrelated, both spatially and temporally.
Insights into the hydrological response to construction ask for the understanding of underlying hydrological mechanisms. A
way to achieve a better understanding of these processes is by modelling them. If spatial and temporal variability are
accounted for in such a model, the behaviour of hydrological mechanisms and their interactions could be predicted.
Incorporating the presence of infrastructure in such model can lead to a better prediction and assessment of the effects of
road construction.
The development of a procedure for linking this type of models with a spatial database can generate useful information
regarding the assessment of the hydrological response of the environment to alterations imposed by road construction. Such
a procedure should be valid for situations where data availability is sub-optimal (which will often be the case within the
framework of EIA).
1 INTRODUCTION
The construction of any transportation system will have a number of environmental impacts (physical, biological, aesthetic,
socio-economic). Early consideration of the full implications of an environmental impact should lead to better design of the
structure (Beinat ef a/., 1999). Since many decisions can not be made by means of public debate, methods have been sought
that provide a rational basis for decision making. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is one of those methods for
evaluation of the sum of impacts. EIA is defined as the process of identifying the likely consequences of the implementation
of a particular activity for the biophysical environment and people's health and welfare and conveying this information in a
stage when it can materially affect the decision to those responsible for taking such decisions (Wathern, 1988).
Environmental Impact Assessment provides a basis for resource management to achieve the goal of sustainability (Sebastiani
et al, 1998). As a tool EIA provides preventive environmental protection and early integration of environmental
considerations in decision making (Feldman, 1998).
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B7. Amsterdam 2000. 175
SES TES
uses
TO me A SE NE aT) AA A a MM
XE RS : ax XL ien AP j S
cm
— EER