ISPRS Commission II, Vol.34, Part 3A „Photogrammetric Computer Vision“, Graz, 2002
(col,row)=F(A,0,H) (3)
(4,9) G(col, row, H) (4)
where (4,9,H) are the geodetic coordinates of the point and
(col,row) are the pixel column and row position. Similar
operations can be done for a SAR image.
2.2 Orientation parameters from the image header
Approximate orbit and attitude parameters can be extracted
from the SPOT image header data. The accuracy of these
orientation parameters was assessed with the points surveyed in
the field using GPS (sub-meter accuracy). Applying the image-
to-object projection for these points, errors in longitude and
latitude (converted to distances) were found to have the
following mean values:
AA — 360m
AgQ- 594m
The methodology proposed significantly improves this figures,
using only one altimetric control point.
3. SAR IMAGE ORIENTATION
3.1 SAR sensor model
The relation between ground and image coordinates in a SAR
image is given by the Doppler and range equations (Curlander,
1982):
2 (s - P).(S- P)
fel cm. (5)
A. |s-P|
p=|s-P|
where /fpc- Doppler shift
A= Wavelength
p= Slant range
S,$ = Satellite position and velocity vectors
P,P = Imaged point position and velocity vectors
start
Figure 3 - Point being imaged in a SAR image processed at zero
Doppler
The exterior orientation is established by the sensor trajectory,
which can be known with high accuracy. From the SAR
processing, fpc is known for any point on the image. The
projection of a point P onto image space consists of solving
equations (522) in order to determine range (p) and time (7).
Knowing the start and end time of image acquisition and the
near and far range, row and column coordinates can be
calculated from 1 and p, respectively. Frequently SAR images
are acquired at zero-Doppler (fpc=0). In this case the problem is
only to find the instant for which relative position and velocity
vectors are perpendicular. Figure 3 represents the search for the
instant of perpendicularity.
Orbit data, as well as reference range and time information,
required to calculate pixel coordinates of a point on the image
space, are extracted from the image header data.
3.2 SAR image orientation using header data
The orbit data and the reference time and range were extracted
from the image header. In order to assess their accuracy, 3D
digital map data were projected onto image space and
superimposed on the images. As map data is in a local map
reference system they had to be converted to WGS84.
There are advantages in using linear features instead of check-
points. Individual points are difficult to find in SAR images and
frequently their location cannot be defined with very good
accuracy. Boundaries of water features are very well defined
and are an alternative to check SAR image orientation.
In the case of the available ERS-2 image a very good
coincidence of river margins could be observed throughout the
entire image. Figure 4 represents a portion of the ERS-2 image
where the river Douro, in the city of Porto, can be identified and
the vector data.
This ERS-2 image is appropriate for the methodology proposed.
Unfortunately it has a very small overlap with the SPOT image.
Figure 4 - Portion of an ERS-1 image (300 by 150 pixels) with
superimposed vector data corresponding to the river
margins, projected onto the image space.
The same procedure was used with the Radarsat image. A
systematic shift of the vector data could be clearly detected.
Figure 5 represents a portion of the Radarsat image with the
superimposed vector data. The displacement was of 5 pixels
(approx. 60 m) in range and only 1 pixel in azimuth-time
direction.
ERR REC Te He LM "
Figure 5 — Portion of the Radarsat image (300 by 150 pixels)
with superimposed vector data.
This shift is within the Radarsat standard of image geolocation,
which is 100 m (Rufenacht et al., 1997). However, this is not
A - 127