Full text: Papers accepted on the basis of peer-review full manuscripts (Part A)

ISPRS Commission III, Vol.34, Part 3A ,,Photogrammetric Computer Vision“, Graz, 2002 
procedure. The suggested mathematical model for incorporating 
straight lines in bundle adjustment with self-calibration is 
described in section 3. Then, we present experimental results 
obtained from the suggested approach using real data. Finally, 
conclusions and recommendations for future work are 
summarized in section 5. 
2. SELF-CALIBRATION: BACKGROUND 
The main objective of photogrammetry is to inverse the process 
of photography. When the film or CCD array inside the camera 
is exposed to light, light rays from the object space pass through 
the camera perspective centre (the lens) until they hit the focal 
plane (fim or CCD array) producing images of the 
photographed objects. Light rays from the object points to the 
corresponding image points passing through the lens are 
assumed to be straight. This assumption is known in the 
photogrammetric literature as the collinearity model (Kraus, 
1993). 
During camera calibration, we determine the IOP, which 
comprise the coordinates of the principal point, the principal 
distance, and image coordinate corrections that compensate for 
various deviations from the collinearity model. There are four 
principal sources of departure from collinearity, which are 
“physical” in nature (Fraser, 1997). These are the radial lens 
distortion, decentric lens distortion, image plane unflatness, and 
in plane image distortion. The net image displacement at any 
point is the cumulative influence of these perturbations. The 
relative magnitude of each one of these perturbations depends 
very much on the quality of the camera being employed. 
2.1 Distortion models 
Radial lens distortion is usually represented by polynomial 
series (Equation 1). The term K, alone will usually suffice in 
medium accuracy applications. The inclusion of K, and Kj 
terms might be required for higher accuracy and wide-angle 
lenses. The decision as to whether to incorporate one, two or 
three radial distortion terms can be based on statistical tests of 
significance. 
Ax pp = Ky (r? =D)x+ Ky (r* Dx Ks (r* -D)x 
2 4 6 (D 
Ayup ^ Ky(r -Dyt K(7' -DytKS,(G -Dy 
where 
pax, +(y=v,)" 
and K,, K; and K; are the radial lens distortion parameters. 
A lack of centring of the lens elements along the optical axis 
gives rise to the second category of lens distortion, namely, 
decentric distortion. The misalignment of the lens components 
cause both radial and tangential distortions which can be 
modelled by correction equations according to (Brown, 1966) 
as follows: 
AXprp 7 P(r’ +2x2)+ 2Pxy 2) 
Ay prp = P,(r? + 2y%)+ 2P xy 
where P, and P; are the decentric lens distortion parameters. 
Systematic image coordinate errors due to focal plane 
unflatness can limit the accuracy of photogrammetric 
triangulation. Radial image displacement induced by focal plane 
unflatness depends on the incidence angle of the imaging ray. 
Narrow angle lenses of long focal length are much less 
influenced by out-of-plane image deformation than short focal 
length and wide-angle lenses. To compensate for focal plane 
unflatness, the focal plane needs to be topographically 
measured. Then, a third- or fourth-order polynomial can model 
the resulting image coordinate perturbations. In this work, the 
effect of focal plane unflatness is assumed to be very small and 
will be ignored. 
In-plane distortions are usually manifested in differential 
scaling between x and y image coordinates. In addition, in- 
plane distortions might introduce image axes non-orthogonality. 
Those distortions are usually denoted affine deformations and 
can be mathematically described by Equation 3. One should 
note that affine deformation parameters, which are correlated 
with other IOP and EOP are eliminated (for example, shifts are 
eliminated since they are correlated with the principal point 
coordinates). 
AY ap = AY 
where A, and A, are the affine distortion parameters. 
(3) 
2.2 Traditional approach of camera calibration 
In traditional camera calibration, convergent imagery is 
acquired over a test field. Together with tie points, a large 
number of control points are measured in both image and object 
space. The extended collinearity equations (Equations 4 and 5) 
are used in bundle adjustment with self-calibration to solve for: 
e Ground coordinates of tie points. 
e EOP of the involved imagery. 
e  IOP ofthe involved camera(s). 
oa X rre Y en zoe (4) 
  
xX, =X 
  
pt NAT TE, ZZ) 
y =y c Xr mU EE Pa) à dy (5) 
: 7 n(X,- X) try(Y,- Y) tn, Z2.) 
where: 
Ax 2 Axgrp + AXpzp + AX ap + Aye 
Ay = AVrzp * AVpip + AV ap + Mere » 
(x) are the observed image coordinates of image 
point a, 
(X ,,Y4,Z,) are the ground coordinates of object point A, 
(Xp: Va) are the image coordinates of the principal point, 
c is the camera constant (principal distance), 
(X,,Y,,Z,) are the ground coordinates of the perspective 
centre, and 
(ij.73,) are the elements of the rotation matrix that 
depend on the rotation angles (0,0, K) . 
3. SUGGESTED APPROACH 
3.1 Mathematical Model 
Before discussing the mathematical model, it should be noted 
that we want to incorporate overlapping images with straight 
A - 145 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.