Full text: Papers accepted on the basis of peer-review full manuscripts (Part A)

(6) 
sed 
Xc, 
der 
7) 
nal 
fts 
NS 
he 
ES 
he 
8) 
ts, 
Ire 
of 
its 
nd 
ng 
2) 
ISPRS Commission III, Vol.34, Part 3A »Photogrammetric Computer Vision“, Graz, 2002 
In the same way, we get: 
WA = 
Zivzi«zi zzi 
0*0 0, -oj! (11) 
9,*91*95-9. 
Kot oo x) 
Similarly, imposing the first and second order continuity 
constraints for X function, we have: 
  
  
axis ain 
Eje U2 
"ES t=0 
and 
d?xi "doin (^ 
dildo van? am 
t=1 t=0 
In the same way, Equations 12 and 13 are written for the other 
external orientation functions, giving: 
AA ZN aid 
Y 32yi s» y]! 
Zi 4221 - zi! 
@i +20 = wi! 
9j 29) - gr^ 
ki x 2k) = kit 
(14) 
for the first order derivative and: 
Ais 
Yir" 
Do "ubt 
Zi=Z5 
i itl (15) 
i+l 
-0» 
zx 
9 
i 
2 
Ki 
for the second order one. 
Equations 10, 11, 14 and 15 are treated as soft (weighted) 
constraints. 
3.0 Mathematical solution 
The functions modelling the external orientation (Equation 7) 
are integrated into the collinearity equations (Equations 2 or 4), 
resulting in an indirect georeferencing model. 
The collinearity equations are linearized with the first-order 
Taylor decomposition with respect to the unknown parameters 
modelling the sensor external orientation (xzo), according to 
Equations 2 (or 4) and 7, and with respect to the unknown 
ground coordinates of the TPs (x7p), according to Equation 7. 
As initial approximations, the parameters modelling the sensor 
external orientation (329) are set equal to zero and the 
approximative ground coordinates of the TPs (32,) are 
estimated with forward intersection, using (Xinstre Yinstre Zinstr» 
Ojnstr» Pinstr» Knsrr) AS external orientation. 
Combining the observations equations and the constraints, the 
system: 
—e€gcp * Agcp Xo -Igcp;PGcp 
— erp = Arp Xgg t Brp Xpp — lzp > Prp 
- eco 9 C$ Xgo - leg ; Peg (16) 
- 6c; 9 C; Xygo ieri P 
—eco = C)? Xgo —lez + Pos 
is built, where: 
Xgo: Vector containing increments to x05 ; 
Xrp: Vector containing increments to; 
Agcp: design matrix for xgo for GCPs observations; 
Arp: design matrix for xp, for TPs observations; 
Brp: design matrix for xrp for TPs observations; 
Co, C;, C3: design matrices for constraints on zero, first 
and second order continuity; 
e: errors of measurements; 
[: discrepancy vectors; 
P: weight matrices for each group of observations. 
GCPs and TPs are required in order to solve the system and 
estimate the unknown external orientation parameters and TPs 
ground coordinates. 
Considering a sensor with S linear CCD arrays, Ngcp GCPs, 
Np TPs and n, trajectory segments, the complete system 
contains 2xSX(Ngcp+Nrp) collinearity equations, together with 
6x(n,-l) equations for each group of constraints described in 
Equations 10, 11, 14 and 15. The unknowns are 18xn, for the 
external orientation and 3x7» for the TP ground coordinates. 
The vectors xzo and x7p are estimated with least-squares 
adjustment and added to x0 and x. in the next iteration. 
The process stops when xgo and xz» are smaller than suitable 
thresholds. 
4. DATA SIMULATION 
Simulated data were used in order to test the indirect 
georeferencing algorithm. 
We assumed an airborne sensor, with the optical system 
consisting of one lens with focal length equal to 60.36 mm. The 
stereo viewing is achieved along-track with 3 linear CCD arrays 
scanning in forward (+21.2 deg), nadir and backward (-21.2 
deg) directions (Figure 3). 
Each linear CCD array consists of 10200 squared elements of 
dimension 7 um. 
Supposing 40832 exposures, the sensor position and attitude at 
each exposure (40832 x 6 data) were generated in a tangent 
local system with origin in the mean of the trajectory at null 
height, X- axis in East direction, Y- axis in North direction and 
Z- axis directed upwards. The aircraft was supposed to flight at 
a mean height of 500 m, along the trajectory shown in Figure 4, 
with a resulting ground pixel size of about 6cm. 
40 GCPs were chosen in a 400 m large and 1600 m wide field, 
with the height in the range between 50 and 80 m. The 
distribution and height of the GCPs is shown in Figure 5. The 
resulting base over height ratio was about 0.7. 
A - 249 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.