ISPRS Commission III, Vol.34, Part 3A »Photogrammetric Computer Vision“, Graz, 2002
In summary, the results show that the segmentation algorithm
tends to merge single tree crowns, which leads to an underesti-
mation of the number of trees.
iL
Figure 5b: Area 7, crown closure 89 95, section of 40x40 m: left
— segmentation result and reference trees, right — tree height
image and segmentation result (white)
4.2.2 Derivation of inventory parameters
The following inventory parameters can be derived from the
results obtained in Chapter 4.2.1:
- Crown area
- Number of trees
- Tree height
- Breast height diameter
- Timber volume
Derivation of crown area
The crown area of single trees is one of the most important
outputs from the segmentation step. The segmentation algo-
rithm produces a raster file where pixels from the same tree
crown are indicated by the same label. Crown area is calculated
by adding up pixels with the same label. Verification of the
crown area assessment was performed with the 78 correctly
segmented spruces out of the 197 verification trees in Hohen-
tauern. The crown areas of these spruce trees were measured by
terrestrial means. The tree-wise comparison of the crown area of
the correctly segmented trees and the crown area measured in
the field showed that segmentation overestimates the crown area
by 5 m? on average. However, measuring crown area in the field
is not easy in steep terrain, thus resulting in an uncertainty in the
verification data. Figure 6 presents the verification results.
70
E 604 x x
£ :
Nt 4
5 50 %
*
E x Ku"
© 407 x x
o Xx x
8 x X x x
2 x x
= 304 x x
a Xx x % x x
= E ts
© 204 Fac $ x *
o A ok XX
x *
Wf cmp Belgian
x x
0 x
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
crown area verification trees
Figure 6: Crown area from segmentation versus crown area of
verification trees (78 spruces, Hohentauern test site, crown area
in m?)
Derivation of number of trees
The estimation of the number of trees is another output from the
segmentation process. Figure 7 depicts the verification results
concerning the number of trees for 23 stands selected represen-
tatively for the Hohentauern test site (each point in figure 7
represents on stand).
600
= m *
.g e
+
ES ^ +
5 400 ey 8
= $ + 6 +
Q >?
© 300 .
un
D e
©
5
«4. 200
©
bt
2
= 1%
e
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
number of trees verification
Figure 7: Verification in terms of number of trees (23 stands,
Hohentauern)
The verification has shown that the number of trees is underes-
timated. On average the segmentation algorithm captured only
56 % of the trees within one stand with a standard deviation of
15 %. However, an uncertainty in the verification data must be
considered, as the number of trees was not measured in the field
but estimated from yield tables.
Derivation of tree height
After segmentation tree height is derived from laser scanner
data by searching for the maxima within one crown segment.
Figure 8 depicts the verification results of tree height measure-
ments for the 78 correctly segmented spruce trees at Hohentau-
ern (see verification crown area).
50
© 401
E *
2 p
E xX
© 301
a x
; A
o 207 % x
<<
e x
B
10 4 x
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
tree height verification
Figure 8: Tree height verification versus tree height from laser
scanner data (78 spruce trees, Hohentauern test site, tree height
in m)
A - 307