Full text: Resource and environmental monitoring (A)

   
-mail: 
scientists. 
e sensing 
site. Also 
ata better 
tral data. 
generate 
bles very 
'ration of 
] spectral 
n and IR 
simulated 
he Green 
he actual 
rable. 
nan eye. 
n virtual 
only in 
ereas the 
QUICK 
, red and 
the blue 
age. In 
spectral 
ral color 
he same 
e easily 
not have 
er to get 
simulate 
to get a 
lone by 
rng the 
the full 
f targets 
of IRS- 
LISS-III , Quick Bird along with Hyderabad data of IRS-1A 
LISS-III has been used. The details areas follow: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Area Satellite Sensor P/R DOP 
Hyderaba | IRS 1A LISS II 25/56 27.03. 
d 2001 
Bangalore | QUICK- MS SAMPL 
Bird E 
2112: 
Chennai IRS-1D LISS-IH | 102/65 98 
Methodology: 
In satellite remote sensing to display the color composite 
: images, three primary colors (red, green and blue) are used. 
When these colours are combined in various proportions, they 
produce different colors in the image. In satellite imagery the 
colors depend on the bands chosen for making the color 
composite. Normally in satellite imagery the concept of false 
color is common. In false color composite the vegetation is 
always in the shades of red. Whenever such images are shown 
to the common man or to the people who are new to the remote 
sensing data the basic question asked is “ why the vegetation is 
red in color”. In order to bring remote sensing to the common 
man it is required to show the data in the form they understand 
It. 
FALSE CO LOUR COMPOSITE 
In satellite remote sensing the visual interpretation is carried 
out using False color composite, commonly known as FCC 
image. NIR, Red and Green spectral bands are assigned the R, 
G, B colors to generate FCC. In FCC the color of the target 
does not resemble to its actual color but the different spectral 
signatures are differentiable. (Ref: Producing remotely sensed 
images — Sea space Remote sensing tutorial — 5) 
A very common composite scheme for displaying the LISS 
multi spectral image is shown below 
R = band 4 (NIR) 
G = band 3 (red) 
B = band 2 (green) 
NATURAL COLOUR COMPOSITE 
Natural color image in the other words TCC (True Color 
Composite) we need to retain the original color of the targets 
hence if blue band is available then Blue will be assigned to B, 
Green will be assigned to G and red will be assigned to R. 
Satellites like IRS-1A/1B, Landsat —5 TM have the sensors in 
blue band so image can be assigned respectively to R, G and B 
colors for display. In this way the colors of the resulting color 
composite image resembles closely what the human eyes 
would observe. Satellites like IRS-1C, 1D sensors do not have 
a blue band. The four bands correspond to Green (0.52 p — 
0.59 p) Red (0.62 p — 0.68 p), Infra red (0.79 p — 0.89 ui) and 
SWIR (1.55u- 1.7p). Therefore to make a natural color 
composite we need to simulate the blue band. 
IAPRS & SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, “Resource and Environmental Monitoring", Hyderabad, India,2002 
  
  
  
  
Natural color 
(1.2.3) 
IN False color 
(4,3,2) 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Figure I: IRS 1A LISS II Band Combinations 
Simulation of the blue band 
The IRS 1A LISS II sensor has four bands Blue ( 0.45 — 
0.52) , Green ( 0.52 — 0.60) , Red ( 0.63 — 0.69) , Infra Red ( 
0.76 — 0.9) (Figure 1.) microns respectively. The Green, Red 
and Infra red bands are similar to the Green , Red and Infra red 
bands of IRS-1D LISS-III sensor. The blue , green red bands 
are in the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum and are 
highly correlated.( Basics of Remote sensing by Lilisand , T.M 
Keifer) Therefore if a correlation between the blue , green and 
red band is worked out the same can be used to IRS-LISS III 
data to simulate the blue band using the green and red bands. 
The following steps have been carried out to get the 
correlation between the bands. 
The IRS-1D and IRS-1A data of Hyderabad area has been 
selected of close by dates. The IRS-1A and IRS-1D data sets 
were registered. DN values of different targets are noted for 
blue and green bands of LISS II sensor and they are converted 
into radiance values. Correlation factor was determined for 
between these two bands by plotting the values. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Blue Green Blue 
(DN (DN (RadianceV Green(Radiance 
Value) | Value) alue) Value) 
59 24 3.9058 1.6776 
75 42 4.965 2.9358 
73 38 4.8326 2.6562 
86 44 5.6932 3.0756 
73 34 4.8326 2.3766 
76 37 5.0312 2.5863 
82 41 5.4284 2.8659 
63 33 4.1706 2.3067 
102 51 6.7524 3.9843 
71 30 4.7002 2.097 
  
  
  
  
  
  
This correlation factor is not uniform for all targets. It varies 
with the type of the targets. Because of this radiance values 
were classified as three categories of the dynamic range as 
Low, Medium and maximum radiance and then correlation 
factor was determined separately for each class. The green 
band was multiplied by these factors by using the spectral math 
routine of the image analysis software. Then to get the exact 
    
    
   
   
     
     
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
     
   
   
  
  
   
   
   
   
   
  
    
  
  
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
     
    
  
    
  
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.