1 be
this
well
und
sing
ible
alue
ters
t to
ters
ugh
s to
lues
the
tion
ters,
rent
nces
tant
hese
a to
the
rrors
ated
RMS
NER
iron-
d (*)
5. SUMMARY
A new semi-empirical technique for the estimation of vegetation
parameters from multispectral image data was proposed and
tested with real data. By inverting physical radiative transfer
models in combination with an empirical model agriculturally
relevant vegetation parameters can be estimated given the grey
value vector of the Daedalus scanner imagery. The inversion of
models was conducted by a least squares adjustment in
combination with simulated annealing. Four vegetation
parameters leaf area index, chlorophyll content, specific dry
matter, and specific water content have been selected for the
inversion process.
Ground control points are a necessary part of our inversion
process and are used for a linear fitting of model-predicted grey
values tó measured grey values. The goal is to use a minimum
of ground control points to receive acceptable accuracies for the
estimated vegetation parameters. Results show that by using at
least one ground control point the accuracies are more or less
independent of the number of ground control points. Using
more than one point increases the robustness of the inversion
process. In this case the grey values at ground control points
should cover the whole range of grey values in the visible
bands. If only one ground control point is used this point should
lie near the center of the grey values range for acceptable
accuracies and robustness.
The influence of constant input parameters of the physical
models on the accuracies has been investigated. Only the soil
reflectance should be adjusted to the actual soil reflectance
occurring at the investigated sites. All other constant parameters
can be set to any values within the definition range.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This project was financed since 1999 by GSF-National
Research Center for Environment and Health in Munich and
Chair for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing at Technical
University Munich. I would like to thank Hans Peschl, Robert
Lanzl and Jan Ketzel for their support during the data
acquisition campaigns in summers 2000/2001 as well as Prof.
Dr.-Ing. Olaf Hellwich and Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Ebner for
their fruitful comments.
" LITERATURE
BIRD, R. E. [1984]. A simple spectral model for direct normal
and diffuse horizontal irradiance, Solar Energy 32: 461-471.
BUELGASIM, A., GOPAL, S. AND STRAHLER, A. [1998]. Forward
and inverse modelling of canopy directional reflectance using a
neural network, International Journal of Remote Sensing 19:
453-471.
GANAPOL, B., JOHNSON, L., HLAVKA, C., PETERSON, D. and
BoND, B. [1999]. LCM2: A coupled leaf/canopy radiative
transfer model, Remote Sensing of Environment 70: 153-166.
GANAPOL, B., JoHNSON, L., HAMMER, P., HLAVKA, C. and
PETERSON, D. [1998]. LEAFMOD: A new within-leaf radiative
transfer model, Remote Sensing of Environment 63: 182-193.
HELLWICH, O. [1999]. Model parameter estimation for digital
image analysis using simulated annealing, Photogrammetrie,
Fernerkundung, Geoinformation: PFG 6: 371-379.
JACQUEMOUD, S. and BanET, F. [1990]. PROSPECT: A model
of leaf optical properties spectra, Remote Sensing of
Environment 34: 75-91.
IAPRS & SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, “Resource and Environmental Monitoring", Hyderabad, India,2002
JACQUEMOUD, S., BARET, F., ANDRIEU, B., DANSON, F. M. AND
JAGGARD, K. [1995]. Extraction of vegetation biophysical
parameters by inversion of the SAIL-PROSPECT models on
sugar beet canopy reflectance data. Application to TM and
AVIRIS sensors, Remote Sensing of Environment 52: 162-172.
KNYAZIKHIN, Y., MARTONCHIK, J., DINER, D., MYNENI, R. and
RuNNING, S. [1998]. Synergistic algorithm for estimating
vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed
photosynthetically active radiation from MODIS and MISR
data, Journal of Geophysical Research 103: 32257-32275.
Kurz, F. and HELLWICH, O. [2000]. Estimation of vegetation
parameters from multispectral images using SAIL-PROSPECT
model, Proceedings of the DGPF-Jahrestagung, Deutsche
Gesellschaft für Photogrammetrie und Fernerkundung: 384-393
Kurz, F., EHRICH, S. and HiNz, S. [2000]. Móglichkeiten und
Grenzen der Bildverarbeitung bei der Charakterisierung von
Vegetationsheterogenitáten mit — Fernerkundungsmethoden,
Berichte der Gesellschaft für Informatik in der Land-, Forst-,
und Ernährungswirtschaft, Vol. 26, Gesellschaft für Informatik
in der Land-, Forst-, und Ernährungswirtschaft, 111-114.
MAIER, S. [2000]. Modelling the radiative transfer in leaves in
the 300nm to 2500nm wavelength region taking into
consideration chlorophyll fluorescence - The leaf model
SLOPE, Dissertation, Department of Physics, Technical
University of Munich.
MIKHAIL, E. M. [1976]. Observations and Least Squares, IEP,
New York.
NILSON, T. and Kuusk, A. [1989]. A reflectance model for the
homogeneous plant canopy and its inversion, Remote Sensing
of Environment 27: 157-167.
PRAGNERE, A., BARET, F., Weiss, M. MYNEN, R,
KNYAZIKHIN, Y. and WANG, L. [1999]. Comparison of three
radiative transfer model inversion techniques to estimate canopy
biophysical variables from remote sensing data, Proceedings of
the IGARSS 99, International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium 99, Hamburg, CD-ROM 0-7803-5210-6.
RICHTER, R. [1992]. Radiometrische Auslegung von Sensoren
und quantitative Auswertung von Fernerkundungsdaten im
optischen Spektralbereich, Forschungsbericht DLR, München.
STONER, E. R. and BAUMGARDNER, M. F. [1981]. Characteristic
Variations in Reflectance of Surface Soils, Soil Science Society
of America 45: 1161-1165 ;
VERHOEF, W. [1984]. Light Scattering by Leaf Layers with
Applications to Canopy Reflectance Modeling: the SAIL
Model, Remote Sensing of Environment 16: 125-141.