IAPRS & SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, “Resource and Environmental Monitoring”, Hyderabad, India, 2002
as well as proposals to establish ports and new industries in the
Gulf of Kachchh region has posed severe threat to the rich
marine life. Earlier to 1950, mangrove forests were in very
good condition in the Gulf, dense and often reaching upto 14 m
or so, represented by Brugueria sp along with species of
Avicennia, Rhizophora, Aegiceras corniculatum, Ceriops tagal
and Sonneratia apetala (Chavan 1985). Today, Brugueria sp is
totally absent, Sonneratia apetala, Rhizophora mucronata and
Ceriops tagal have become vulnerable species and Aegiceras
corniculatum has become endangered (Nayak and Bahuguna
2001). Coral reefs in the Gulf are located in the northern-most
latitude of the Indian Ocean. Earlier the growth of corals here
was extensive and rich but the present day corals are scanty
(Singh 2000). There are 56 coral species recorded from the
Gulf out of which 44 are hard coral species (Singh 2000).
Ikedella misakiensis a rare coral species is found in the Gulf of
Kachchh (It has been reported from only 3 places in the world).
Ikedosoma pirotanens*-, another species of coral is only found
to occur in the Gulf of Kachchh. For the present study the core
Marine National Park area has been studied.
3. DATABASE GENERATED
As this is an attempt to establish methodology for vital habitats
management, the two vital habitats of the core Marine National
Park (MNP) region have been studied, namely, mangroves and
coral reefs.
3.1 Spatial Database
Habitat Maps
Coastal wetland maps, mangrove habitats maps and coral reef
habitat maps (prepared using Landsat MSS, Landsat TM,
SPOT, IRS LISS II, IRS LISS III of period 1975-2001)
prepared earlier (Nayak et al. 1989, Pandeya et al. 1989, Nayak
et al. 1992, Bahuguna et al. 1992, Bahuguna and Nayak 1996,
Bahuguna and Nayak 1998, Navalgund and Bahuguna 1999,
Nayak and Bahuguna 2001), were converted into digital
database. The mangrove habitat maps have been generated
from 1986 to 2001 showing extent of dense mangroves, sparse
mangroves, degraded mangroves, defoliated mangroves,
mudflats, march vegetation, etc. The coral reef habitat maps
generated from 1990 to 2001 show the type of reef, area
covered by reef flat, mud depositions on the reef, sand, and
algae. The coastal wetland maps of the core MNP have been
generated from 1975 to 1993 and indicate the extent of
wetlands between LTL and HTL. The classification accuracy
of the maps was estimated to be 84-93% at 90% confidence
level.
Coral reef eco-morphological maps
Coral reefs exhibit distinctive patterns of morphological and
ecological zones, which are determined by the morphology;
spatial and temporal variations; interaction between the
hydrodynamic processes (waves and tides); geomorphic
processes (sediment generation, sorting and transport) and
ecological process (abundance, composition, growth form,
cover and productivity in biological communities).
Communities of species and/or substrata often exhibit
considerable variability and several distinct communities may
inhabit each morphological zone. After appropriate image
corrections and image enhancements techniques each IRS LISS
III (of period 1998-2001) dataset has been classified using
Maximum Likelihood Classifier. Sufficient ground information
404
has been used to generate signatures for classifying. IRS LISS
IIT and PAN merged data helped in boundary delineation and in
generating signatures. Contextual editing was done to improve
the classification accuracy. The classification accuracy of these
maps is 86-87% at 90% confidence level. The eco-
morphological zones of the Kalubhar reef are shown in Fig.1.
+
Source: IRS LISS III
Teig M 4 5
E. a
Data of 29 Jan 2001
EN Reef slope {1 Algae on sand & mud
BEEN Algal Ridge (QI Sandy beach/patch
B88 Live corals & algae EE] Mangroves
El Shallow reef flat [CJ Algae on mud
Reef flat (mud, sand,rubbles) EZZ] Turbid water
CJ Mud
Fig.1: Eco-morphological zones of
Kalubhar Reef
Dominant Community Maps of Mangroves
The dominant communities of the mangroves were mapped
using IRS LISS III data. A combination of the physiographic
and structural attributes of mangrove wetlands, together with
local conditions of topography and hydrology, were used to
formulate the classification system to map dominant mangrove
communities using RS data (Nayak and Bahuguna 2001,
Bahuguna and Nayak 1996). Any change in community settings
over the years indicates habitat setting change or change due to
environmental conditions, developmental impact, etc. In fact
the first indicator that a mangrove habitat is degrading is the
occurrence of mono-species in the habitat, especially,
Avicennia. The classification system helps to develop proper
ecosystem management goals for the diverse types of mangrove
wetlands around the tropical as well as subtropical coastlines of
the world (Bahuguna & Nayak 1996). For zoning the mangrove
communities IRS LISS III data including middle infrared band
was subjected to image corrections and enhancements. Band-
ratio was carried out for each period as follows, Red/NIR,
MIR/NIR, Red/MIR. Classification was then carried out using
the hybrid colour composite image comprising ratioed products
with individual LISS III band data was generated. Validation
exercises were carried out in which 108 points were verified on
ground out of which four failures were encountered. The
accuracy was thus estimated to be 94% at 90% confidence
level. Fig.2 shows the dominant mangrove communities of the
region.