oves the phase
image derived
iave found to
led and multi-
[gorithm when
unwrap even
bus unwrapped
1ality maps are
e.
been evaluated
signal-to-noise
11 unwrapping
t higher SNR
ective. Quality
st performance
quality maps
, and yields
to thank Dr.
e and Water
ntre (ISRO),
ng, J.A., 2000.
Aperture Radar
83-C (12), pp.
interferometry-
nal Journal of
ensional phase
tware. Wiley-
93p.
Cl 1988.
isional phase
etry. Scientific
1s of multigrid
ransactions on
-738.
correlation in
nsactions on
IAPRS & SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, "Resource and Environmental Monitoring", Hyderabad, India,2002
A SIMULATION STUDY ON RETRIEVAL OF LEAF AREA INDEX USING PRINCIPAL
COMPONENT INVERSION TECHNIQUE
Sasmita Chaurasia and Vinay K. Dadhwal
Crop Inventory and Modelling Division
Agricultural Resource Group, RESA
Space Applications Centre, ISRO
sasmitas(@ yahoo.com, dadhwalvk@hotmail.com
AHMEDABAD - 380015, INDIA
* Commission VII, WG VII/6
KEYWORDS: Leaf Area Index (LAI), Principal Component Inversion (PCI), Canopy Reflectance Model
ABSTRACT:
A simulation study has been carried to investigate the use of Principal Component Inversion (PCI) technique for the retrieval of leaf
area index (LAI). The PROSAIL model has been used for the forward analysis for the estimation of multispectral reflectance for a
total of 2880 combinations of LAI, soil reflectance, leaf inclination angle (61), chlorophyll a+b concentration (Cab), sun and view
angle (0s, Ov). The developed model (three separate and one combined) when tested for independent 100 samples with LAI range
0.1-7.0 with different soil and the combination of three type of soil as background indicated that the retrieved LAI from PCI has
higher accuracy (RMSE= 0.37, 0.26,0.24 and 0.37 for bright, medium, dark and combination of three soil, respectively) than the
NDVI approach (RMSE=0.76, 0.93, 0.73, 0.75)
1. INTRODUCTION
Leaf area index (LAI) quantifies the amount of foliage area per
unit ground surface area. It is an important parameter
controlling . many biological-physical processes like
evapotranspiration, photosynthesis and yield apart from its
effect on radiation exchange with the atmosphere through its
effect on albedo. LAI is also an input parameter for estimation
of net primary production (NPP) (Nemry et al, 1996), in crop
simulation models (Moulin et al, 1998) and a number of
modeling studies related to agriculture and hydrology (Wiegand
and Richadson, 1984, Kergoat, 1999). The accurate estimation
of this biophysical parametr thus interests scientist world wide
from different segment. A number of approaches ranging from
empirical relationship of spectral indices to LAI and the CR
based models have been used for the estimation of LAI from
remote sensing data (Nemani et al., 1993; Cihlar et al, 2002;
Myneni, 1997; Cihlar, 1997; Liu et al, 1999).
The empirical models are site and sensor specific and unsuitable
for application to large areas or in different seasons. The CR
based approaches with the assumption of homogeneous canopy
are more physical and rigorous and best suited for agricultural
crops. However, the CR based techniques are not widely used
due to the complexities involved in the inversion of the model.
Thus there is a need for a simpler approach for the retrieval of
LAI. .
The simulation experiment has been set up to resemble with the
real remote sensing data. The principal component analysis has
been used successfully in diverse fields (Price, 1990:1992,
Rabbett et al, 2001, Charlock et al (1990); Bess et al, 1992,
Haskins et al, 1999). Chauhan and Nayak (1998) have reported
the retrieval of chlorophyll from IRS-MOS data following an
approach involving direct modeling with PCA (Krawezyk et al,
1993),
2. METHODS
The study has been carried out in the following steps
a. Use of a direct model for the simulation of canopy
reflectance as a function of viewing and leaf
properties. .
b. Application of PCA and development of PCI co-
efficients for LAI retrieval and
c. Testing of the retrieval accuracy for an independent
set of simulated reflectances and comparison with
NDVI based approach.
2.1 Direct Model
A number of CR models have been proposed and most widely
used for crop canopies amongst them is PROSAIL
(PROSPECT+SAIL). The PROSAIL model includes SAIL
(Verhoef, 1984), PROSPECT (Jacquemoud and Baret, 1990)
and the hot spot effect. SAIL model is a turbid medium model
with assumption of homogeneous semi-infinite medium. crop
canopy with Lambertian reflecting leaves. The input parameters
in this model are leaf reflectance (p;) and transmittance (ty), leaf
area index (LAI), average leaf inclination angle (0j, soil
reflectance (ps) and the fraction of diffused incident solar
radiation (skyl). PROSPECT model simulates the leaf optical
properties from visible to mid infrared as a function of only
three variables: a parameter that counts for the leaf mesophyll
structure (N), chlorophyll a+b concentration (C,, in ug cm?)
and leaf water content (C, in cm).
The PROSAIL model (version 3.01, Jacquemoud, 1993) has
been used for simulation of the canopy spectral reflectance for
six bands centered around 500, 595, 677.5, 800, 1707.5 and
2187.5 nm, corresponding to LANDSAT TM for a range of
plausible input parameters listed in table 1.