Full text: Resource and environmental monitoring (A)

UDY 
LE 
oherence 
Tom this 
;ouple is 
It is also 
alysis of 
is not in 
seful for 
perty of 
sls. 
rties or 
nces on 
2). The 
atterns 
ialue of 
>lements 
ric data 
bility of 
le, some 
en rock 
ome are 
even at 
: lements 
of time. 
| terrain 
1 ERS-1 
ondition 
for ERS 
1 couple 
nts into 
IAPRS & SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, “Resource and Environmental Monitoring”, Hyderabad, India, 2002 
different landuse-landcover classes by the previous workers 
(Stussi et al, 1996). On the other hand, in a 35-day ERS 
couple, stability of the terrain is much less because of its larger 
temporal baseline and therefore it is not encouraged much for 
terrain analysis. In this work, an evaluative study to compare 
the utility of ERS tandem couple and 35-day couple using 
temporal stability as a criterion for terrain analysis has been 
attempted. Coherence images of the couples of longer temporal 
baselines have also been studied in this work in an attempt to 
characterize temporal stability of different terrain elements. 
2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 
The degree of interferometric correlation between the images is 
known as coherence. The value of coherence depends on the 
speckle patterns in two SAR images of the interferometric 
couple. Speckle effect in SAR image results from the difference 
in vectorial sum of backscattered energy from the elementary 
targets or scatterers in the adjacent pixels. Number of scatterers 
in a pixel depends on radar wavelength being used but their 
differential temporal response depends on the nature of the 
terrain as a function of stability of the scatterers with time. 
When all the scatterers in a particular pixel remains more or 
less stable for a given time interval, the vectorial sum of 
backscattered energy will remain unchanged for that pixel in 
the two images. Consequently, the value of coherence will be 
very high (- 1). Temporal stability of the scatterers within a 
resolution cell varies from one landcover to the other. For 
example, water changes its physical shape and therefore the 
stability of the scatterers within a resolution cell of water body 
gets disturbed in milliseconds. The value of coherence is 
therefore always very low for water bodies independent of the 
temporal baseline of the repeat-pass couple. The similar 
situation occurs in case of agricultural and heavily vegetated 
areas for temporal baselines of several weeks. On the other 
hand, scatterers in sparsely vegetated areas remain stable for 
longer duration. Scatterers within a resolution cell of dry soil 
and sand deposits remain generally stable with time unless 
disturbed by natural factors e.g., storm, rain or human 
interference which causes change in their positions or dielectric 
properties. In bare rock outcrops and urban areas, scatterers 
within a resolution cell may be considered to be more or less 
stable irrespective of the time interval. So, the value of 
coherence for such landuse-landcover classes is generally 
always high independent of the temporal baseline of the couple. 
The value of coherence also depends on geometric criteria 
of the interferometric couple. This includes spatial baseline 
between the two images and the areas of layover in the 
individual images. With increasing effect of both the 
parameters, the value of coherence reduces. 
The value of coherence between two complex SAR images 
Z, and Z; is calculated as described below: 
* 
EZ, Z5 
Ez |g Iza] | 
The expectation value operator 'E' is in practice 
approximated with a sampled average over n samples as 
described below: 
  
  
  
y- 
577 
Xn ZZ 
Ms 
Asa zz 
However, topography of the terrain contributes to the value 
of coherence as a function of phase difference of the 
  
  
  
 interferometric image. The topography-compensated coherence 
value is therefore truer representative of temporal changes in 
the speckle patterns of the individual pixels. The topography- 
compensated coherence may be estimated using topographic 
phase contribution in the interferometric couple ($) as 
described below: 
Zn ZZ 558 
n - ; 
VEn|Z1| En|Z2| 
3. MATERIALS AND TOOLS 
  
  
In this study, ERS tandem couple and 35-day couple of a test 
site of Mauritania were used to compare and evaluate their 
utility for terrain analysis. Tandem couple was acquired in 
ascending mode in April 1996. This has a perpendicular spatial 
baseline of 111 m. The 35-day couple was acquired in 
descending mode during June-July 1999. This has a 
perpendicular spatial baseline of 829 m. 
In addition, interferometric couples from parts of Iraq and Iran 
were available in this study, which helped to gain better 
understanding of temporal stability criterion of the terrain 
elements. The interferometric data couples are as described 
below: 
(i) ERS tandem couple from a test site in Iraq, acquired during 
May 1996, and a 1121-day couple of the same area acquired in 
May 1996 and May 1999 were used in this study. The couples 
have perpendicular spatial baselines 105 m. and 62 m. 
respectively. 
(i1) ERS 1121-day couple from a test site in Iran acquired in 
May 1996 and June 1999 with perpendicular spatial baseline of 
43 m. 
Data processing for generating coherence image from the 
interferometric couples was carried out using DIAPASON 
interferometric tool, developed by CNES, France. Due to 
unavailability of DTM, topographic contribution in coherence 
values could not be compensated. 
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 
It is observed that the overall coherence in land area is 
strikingly higher in tandem couple (Figure 1a) than that in 35- 
day couple (Figure 1b) of Mauritania test site. On the other 
hand, coherence is very low in either of tandem couple or 35- 
day couple due to the intrinsic unstable nature of water body at 
millisecond interval. In the coherence image of the tandem 
couple, various terrain elements such as active coast, low-lying 
backshore region, arid open fields with sand deposits and 
sparsely vegetated areas can be delineated. This is not possible 
from the 35-day couple due to its low overall coherence. 
However, in the 35-day couple, beach area, being the most 
stable zone in the coast can be mapped nicely, which is not 
possible from the tandem couple. Similarly, the urban area 
(Nouakchott city area) can be demarcated in the 35-day couple 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.