TRICT
pts.
ysiography,
lideline for
ain. Based
) IV (65%)
istochrepts
h adjacent
' separated
of Ranga
24,000 ha.
and 18?20'
scene with
age annual
he soils of
by visual
terpret the
It was also
d compare
ubscene at
used for
visits for
forms and
egend was
iting with
assified as
| and site
oes (CCT)
ectral data
ed on the
und truth
olour was
5 of mean
ters was
rithms to
fter going
ere made.
rized data
itability of
different
IAPRS & SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, “Resource and Environmental Monitoring”, Hyderabad, India, 2002
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Visual interpretation: The study area comprised of Basalt and
Granite landscape with intrusions of dolorite dyke and Quartz
reef in the granite terrain. Fifteen physiographic and soil units
were identified (Table-1- Legend). Major soils in the area
were found to be Rhodustalfs, Udic, Haplustalfs, Typic/Entic
Chromusterts, Typica ustorthents and Typic ustochrepts. Thirty
five, Fifty five and Ten percent of soils were identified to be
subjected to slight, moderate and severe erosion respectively.
The soils are generally moderately well drained, except in
broad valley fills where inadequate drainage conditions prevail
due to flat relief position. The Granitic hills are however
excessively drained. Soil slope is 0-11% in the valley fills, and
15-33% in the pediplain and 15-33% in the hills. Soil depth is a
constraint in the hilly tract as well as in the crest portion of
pediplain where the soils are young, without any horizonation
and they are classified as Typic Ustortants.
Based on the profile and site characteristics and the climate of
the area, the soils were grouped under land capability class II to
IV(65%) and VI to VIII(35%). The course textured shallow
soils in granitic pediplain could not be separated due to the lack
of tonal variations. These lands were categorized as the VI and
kept associated as the class IV land in the same unit.
CLASSES II to IV lands is suitable for agriculture and
horticulture, whereas VI and VII are suitable for pastures,
silvipasture, rain-fed horticulture and forestry. Class VIII land
was found to be meager in extent (less than 1%), which is an
uncultivable waste.
Digital analysis: the study area could be classified into four
categories in respect of soils (Table-2-Legend) as against
Table-2-Legend
Chromusterts
Udic 10000 41
Rhodustalfs;
Udic haplustalfs
Water bodies 300 1
Vegetation 3400 14
Total 24000 100
fifteen units by visual interpretation at 1:50,000 scale.
Vegetation in the hills and reserve forest area hampered the soil
classification, which covered around 15% of the area.
Remarkable findings in the digital analysis were the finer
separability of chromustats in basalt landscape, which are
visually inseparable. Similarly the shallow eroded patches of
granitic pediplane were classified separately from the deep,
moderately eroded pediplan.
Spectral response of soil and land features: spectral
response of different soils (Table- 3- Soils & Site
Characteristics) illustrate that maximum reflection comes
from Ustorthents and minimum from Chromusterts which is in
accordance with the established soil spectral response curves.
Evaluation of different band combination and image
enhancement techniques revealed that in general stand and
False Colour Composit (FCC) gives maximum separability of
different land features. Different images enhancement
techniques were also found to be very useful in improving the
image characteristics (Table-4 Land Feature as Depicted in
Satellite Data).
Conclusion: Visual interpretations of Satellite data is a reliable
technique for soil survey but for the limitation that the
Ustorthents/Ustochrepts developed at the Crest portion of the
Soil Total Area Percentage inter-flows of granitic terrain -are not separable due to poor
(ha) tonal contrast with adjacent Haphisltalfs and Chodustalfs. As
Typic 1500 6 against this, by digital analysis the shallow, eroded (sheet
Ustorthents erosion) Ustorthents could be separated from other soils. The
Typic 8000 34 effectiveness con however be quantified by comparing the
Ustochrepts output with a detailed soil survey map.
Typic 800 4
Table-1-Legend
Mapping Physiography Image characteristics Soils
unit
H Hills -
Hl Granitic Hills Brown, coarse texture Loamy skeletal typic Ustorthents
H2 Bsaalt-Mesa -
H21 Mesa-top Dark brown, fine texture Fine Typic Chromusterts
H22 Mesa-periphel slope Light brown, medium texture | Fine Typic Ustorthents
H3 Dolerite dyke Linear (WE) dark brown Clayey skeletal Typic Ustorthents
structure
H4 Quartz reef Linear (NS) light brown Loamy skeletal Typic Ustrothents
structure
P Pediplain - -
Pl Basalt-Moderately eroded | Dark brown, fine texture Fine Typic Chromusterts
P2 Basalt-Severely eroded Light brown, medium texture | Fine Typic Ustochrepta
P3 Granitic-Moderately Yellow with few grey Fine loamy Udic Rhodustalfs,
eroded mottles Fine loamy Udic Haplustalfs
P4 Granitic-Severely eroded Grey with few yellow Coarse loamy Typic Ustrothents,
mottles Loamy skeletal Udic Ustochrepts
V Valley fills - Fine loamy Typic Haplustalfa
V1 Narrow (<10 mm wide) Light brown with red mottles | Fine loamy Typic Ustifluvents
V2 Broad (210 mm wide) Brown with red mottles Fine entice Chromusterts
761