Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 1)

  
   
   
   
     
   
   
  
  
    
   
   
   
   
    
   
   
   
   
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
  
    
   
  
   
   
   
     
   
  
  
    
   
    
    
      
  
  
  
  
   
    
  
   
  
   
    
hul 2004 
ach was 
ighbours 
om the 
| closest 
nt to be 
of these 
ng the 
liagram. 
ours is 
chnique. 
ormed. 
era and 
ampling 
ampling 
id. flight 
| stimmt 
1 
ight 
> results 
  
  
  
  
  
impling 
ind line 
. and B 
ted and 
images. 
pled on 
ion and 
ore and 
ness 1S 
, which 
  
  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B1. Istanbul 2004 
  
Figure 9. Resolution pattern — bar target and Siemens star. 
Interpolated (left image) and restored image (right image) 
To quantify the resolution and the results of restoration we 
investigate modulation of different resolution patterns (see 
figure 10). A convenient approach is the analysis of radial 
modulation of the Siemens star. 
  
  
  
  
  
Figure 10. Analysis of modulation from Siemens star (left) 
with radial modulation analysis for one circle (right) 
The diameter of the star in pixel is proportional to 
circumference of a circle and can be analysed in relation to 
image pixel. Different diameter realize variable spatial 
frequencies. The evaluation of the modulation for different 
radii gives a quantitative prediction for the resolution. 
  
    
   
  
  
  
1.D 1 SIEGE II 
x 
OR * restored dota zs 
Et +. (somp=5em) 
3 
| m A 
c0 — 
C p 
> N - 
n \ 4 
wo E À 
à 
c 04F- = = 
dw : 
original data original data 
l- (samp=2.5em} « sam 4 
Ql erac ais on Ca Le Ee cbt A EE 
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 
Frequency [lp/ pixel] 
Figure 11. Evaluation of the modulation from Siemens star 
In figure 11 the measured data from modulation analysis are 
shown. The measured data are in a good accordance to a fit on 
a Gaussian. The original data are sampled on 5 cm and 2.5 cm. 
The analyses of the Gaussian parameter o (which is 0.5 pixel 
for the 5 cm data) shows the expected factor of two between 
both measures. The influence of restoration before rectification 
provide an improvement in cand therefore in resolution, 
which is also a factor of two. Using resolution definition like in 
chapter 2.4 the MRD is in the range of 7.5 cm for the original 
data and better than one pixel for the restored data. 
CONCLUSION 
The given results from the Rheintal test mission show the large 
potential of ADS40. The results will be reconfirmed by another 
test flight, that will be flown in the Vaihingen/Enz test site, 
maintained from Institute for Photogrammetry (ifp). Besides 
the verification of resolution potential a second focus 1s laid on 
the analysis of the maximum geometric accuracy, which will be 
evaluated from independent check points in object space. In 
this context especially the influence of different IMU quality 
for subsequent data processing is investigated. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
The authors would like to thank Werner Schneider, Susanne 
Becker and Mathias Schneider for preparation and evaluation 
of the data. 
BILIBOGRAPHY 
Andrews, H.C. and Hunt, B.R., 1977. Digital Image 
Restoration”, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 
Haala, N., Stallmann, D., Cramer, M., 1998, Calibration of 
directly measured position and attitude by aerotriangulation of 
three-line airborne imagery, in: T. Schenk & A. Habib, eds, 
ISPRS Commission II Symposium on Object Recognition and 
Scene Classification from Multispectral and Multisensor 
Pixels, Columbus/Ohio, USA, pp. 23-30. 
Hinz, A., 2000. Digital Modular Camera: System Concept and 
Data Processing Workflow, In: The International Archives of 
the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information 
Sciences, Amsterdam, Vol. XXXIII, Part B2. pp. 164. 
Holst, G.C., 1998, Sampling, Aliasing, and Data Fidelity for 
Electronic Imaging Systems, Communications, and Data 
Acquisition, SPIE-Press 
Jahn, H., Reulke,R. 2000, Staggered Line Arrays in 
Pushbroom Cameras: Theory and Application, International 7he 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing 
and Spatial Information Sciences, Amsterdam, Vol. XXXIII, 
Part BI, pp. . 164 
Katsaggelos, A.K., 1991. Digital image restoration“ , - Berlin ; 
Heidelberg : Springer 
Leberl F.; 2003, The UltraCam Large Format Aerial Digital 
Camera System. Proceedings of the  ASPRS Annual 
Convention, Anchorage / Alaska, USA, May 5-9 (CD only). 
Reulke, R., 1995, Comparison of image reconstruction 
algorithms, Remote Sensing and Reconstruction for Three- 
Dimensional Objects and Scenes, SPIE 2572-14, p.126 
Sandau, R., 2000, Design Principles of the LH Systems ADS40 
Airborne Digital Sensor, In: The International Archives of the 
Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information 
Sciences, Amsterdam, Vol. XXXIII, Part B2, pp. 552.559. 
Sibson, R., 1981, A brief description of natural neighbour 
interpolation. In V. Barnet, (ed) Interpreting Multivariate Data 
John Wiley & Sons, pp. 21 - 36 
  
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.