Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 1)

solution for mapping in general and cadastral surveying in 
particular (Harvey and Hill, 2001). 
The current and upcoming high spatial resolution satellite 
imagery is expected to have a significant impact on mapping 
applications of primary data acquisition, especially on attending 
surveyor's interests and accuracies. — Spatial resolution of 
multispectral data was reduced from 20m to 5m for SPOT 
products in less than two decades. The use of panchromatic 
products improved with the launch of high resolution 
commercial satellite like IKONOS and Quickbird, and the 
production of accurate terrain model is a big success mainly for 
developing countries (Bernard and Munier, 2003). 
Few cadastral projects have used satellite imagery to delimitate 
parcel boundaries. SPOT images (SPOT 4) have been used in 
Argentina and Nicaragua fiscal and physical cadastral pilot 
projects, yet because of its spatial resolution it was conclude 
that it was not possible to produce accurate boundary maps for 
cadastral purpose (Axes, 2004). In general, because of the 
specification of the images, high resolution satellite imagery can 
be used for pre-cadastral projects as an analysis instrument for 
the delimitation process, also as a support in the procedure and 
methodology decisions process (GDTA, 1997; Axes, 2004). 
Descriptions of area of study, creation of cadastral maps, less 
expensive updates, multifunctional cadastral data as land value 
maps via remote sensing and GIS techniques (Nisanci and 
Yomrahoglu, 2002) are some of the potential use of the satellite 
imagery in cadastral projects. The combination of pre-cadastral 
data from satellite images and traditional surveying techniques 
allows an execution of cadastral projects in only 20-50 months 
(Lebeau, 1999; Axes, 2004). The significant reduction of costs 
is one of the most important attractiveness of the use of satellite 
images for cadastral projects (Garcia, 2001); in Guatemala the 
cost of 1/30 000 aerial photographies for a nearby region was 
US$ 30/Km° (Kadaster, 2001) compared to US$ 4/Km’ for the 
orthoimage used in this study . 
SPOT 5 was designed to improve the geometric performance of 
its previous models. SPOT 5 data is constituted of 
panchromatic band, visible infrared and shortwave infrared 
band with a swath width of 60 Km. Stereopairs of 5m spatial 
resolution are acquired systematically from across track 
solutions, allowing the production of 2.5m orthoimages by a 
resampling algorithm. As Bernard and Munier (2003) 
reminded, this production will prove interesting and efficient 
maps for rural cadastre where the accuracy needed in not less 
than the orthoimage spatial resolution. 
3. DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA AND DATA 
3.1 Study area 
The study area is located in the department of Izabal, Guatemala 
(figure 1). Located in the northeast region of the country, this 
tropical area includes a number of plains and low rugged 
mountain ranges. Generally the study area was chosen for its 
diverse set of terrain features. The flood plains, characterized 
by rich deposits, are occupied by rice, banana plantations and 
cattle breeding Bare soil, scrub, survival plantations and 
forests cover the rugged areas. 
3.2 Database 
Two types of data were integrated to provide the database used 
in this study; namely SPOT 5 orthoimage and field data. The 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B1. Istanbul 2004 
image processing systems used for this project were ERDAS 
Imagine 8.3, AutoCAD 2000 and ArcView 3.2. 
Ground control points were provided to SPOTIMAGE to 
relocate the image to 2.5 m accuracy. Field data included the 
measurement of 669ha. with total station and GPS equipments 
for rural and urban properties. ^ Sub-areas were divided 
depending on the extension and topography. by this, large 
extensions in flat terrain, medium and small estates in rugged 
topography as well as peri-urban and urban properties were 
surveyed and identified on the orthoimage. 
  
    
2 | 4 5 
| x 
| a x 
i m FE” Ten 
i ^ i 
| T i i 
Í e. i 
i tu i 
i * | 
| j i 
| HL | 
i i 
i i 
| i 
i i 
i i 
Ï i 
i s 
i i 
i 
i 
i . 
i Á 
i A 
{ : 23 
Ï x i 
i € 2 £ 
i Y n 
| : 3 | 
- NEN 
ab ar 
“uh i 
Figure l. Map of Guatemala, the image extension is indicated 
with a rectangular box. 
4. METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS 
A number of display scales were evaluated for the orthoimage 
identification process. Depending on the region and nature of 
the area — topography, size of the parcel and image 
identification utility — the appropriate scale was chosen, 
providing the clearest visual distinction of boundaries and 
vertices. 
As the quality of the image was considered poor, the 
identification was held on the image itself and two derived 
enhanced images — 3x3 and 5x5 windows. 
The evaluation was made by comparing the resulted digitised 
data from the total station or GPS measurements — reference 
data — and the one from the orthoimage identification — 
extracted data — for each parcel encountered in the study arca. 
Land surveying analysis are mainly composed of comparisons 
of areas and distance between vertices among the distinct data 
as shown in table ! and figure 4 and 5. 
4.1 Rural properties 
For large extension in flat terrain, boundaries were easily 
identified in the enhanced orthoimage as observed in figure 2 
and 3. In this case, field borders are trees, live enclosure or 
fences with presence of vegetation, roads or foot paths and 
water drainage with the presence of low altitude vegetation. 
Variation of surface between the reference data and the 
extracted one is very low (0.14%) and in average the 
localization of the boundary in the identification process is of 
4.3 meters away from the reference data. 
  
  
  
     
    
    
   
   
   
    
   
    
    
     
  
  
  
  
   
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
    
  
  
    
    
    
       
      
      
    
  
   
    
   
    
    
   
     
       
    
  
   
   
Intern 
MÀ 
  
  
  
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.