tanbul 2004 
re ERDAS 
IMAGE to 
ncluded the 
equipments 
(re. divided 
this, large 
s in rugged 
erties were 
  
indicated 
rthoimage 
] nature of 
nd image 
is. chosen, 
daries and 
poor, the 
0 derived 
d digitised 
- reference 
fication — 
study area. 
mparisons 
stinct data 
ere. easily 
n figure 2 
closure or 
paths and 
egetation. 
| and the 
erage the 
cess is of 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part Bl. Istanbul 2004 
  
Figure 2. Delimitation of large extension parcel 
on SPOT 5 orthoimage. 
  
Figure 4. Delimitation of medium parcels on SPOT 5 
orthoimage. Reference data in black, extracted data in blue. 
  
  
\ 
Figure 6. Delimitation of prei-urban parcels. 
Deformation of 
shapes can be observed. 
data in black, 
  
extracted data in blue. 
  
  
Reference 
  
Figure 3. Comparison between surveyed data (GPS in this case) 
in black and the image identification data in blue. The difference 
between the dataset is 3.85m 
   
Figure 5. Difference of vertice location. 
Reference data in black, extracted data in blue. 
  
  
  
  
Figure 7. Black polygons represent buildings. 
They were measured with total stations. As it can 
be noted, building identification is limited.