Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 1)

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B1. Istanbul 2004 
3. DATA EVALUATION 
The work flow can be subdivided into 7 steps: 
l. Direct geo-referencing of the images using the supplied 
orientation parameters (auxiliary data) 
2. Measurement of control and check points in the 8 TS 
3. Mass point generation in image space using region 
growing matching algorithm. 
4. Bundle adjustment estimating correction polynomials 
5. Transformation of image mass points into object space 
using both strict model and rational functions 
6. DSM generation using both types of data sets 
7. Comparison of the DSMs with the reference DTM and 
statistical evaluation. 
3.1 Direct Geo-referencing 
In a primary step the images are directly geo-referenced 
applying the model described in the SPOT Satellite Geometry 
Handbook (SPOT Image, 2002) using the supplied orientation 
parameters and look angles. The main purpose of this step is to 
check the consistency and the quality of the auxiliary data. 
Comparing the resulting horizontal coordinates and the 
reference coordinates deduced from the orthoimages for a 
measured sample point, differences of less than 30 m are 
obtained which impressively demonstrates the high quality of 
the supplied SPOT-5 auxiliary data. The program later is 
extended to consider the estimated correction polynomials (see 
3.4.1) and is used for the calculation of the cube data, needed 
for the computation of the rational functions (see 3.6) 
3.2 Measurement of control and check points 
It was planned to have a group of 5 points for each test site to 
serve either as control or as check points. They are measured 
by an experienced operator on a digital photogrammetric 
workstation with matching support in the HRS and THR 
images and also in the respective orthoimages. For time 
reasons only one of the four orthoimages per testsite is used. 
For a better point identification the different image scales of 
the HRS images are adapted applying a scale factor of 2 in 
scan direction. Nevertheless, the point identification resulted 
to be very difficult, especially in the scaled oblique looking 
HRS images. Only points lying on the ground surface can be 
selected, since the reference heights are taken from a terrain 
model. Due to the presence of forests and buildings in wide 
areas of the test sites #3, #4 and #6, there it was not possible 
to measure all 5 points. 19 points of the TS #1, #3, #7 and #8 
are taken as control points and 17 points of the remaining TS 
#2, #4, #5 and #6 as check points (see figure 3). 
3.3 Mass point generation in image space 
For the mass point generation in image space a modified 
region growing algorithm, originally developed by (Otto and 
Chau, 1989), is used, which already has successfully been 
applied to SPOT-1 images in the early 90es (Heipke and 
Kornus, 1991). Starting from a couple of manually measured 
so-called seed points, the algorithm matches the four 
neighbour pixels (left, right, upper and lower) at a given 
distance. For this study 1 pixel distance of the original HRS 
image is chosen. If the matching result meets some specified 
criteria (a minimum correlation coefficient, a maximum 
number of iterations, etc.) the point is added to a list and 
serves itself as a new seed point. The process ends after all 
points of the list are matched and no more neighbours can be 
found, which meet the criteria. 
The algorithm is applied to sections within the 8 test site of 
the HRS1, HRS2 and the THR images with a size of approx. 
2700 x 3300 THR pixels. For each test site 3 matching 
combinations are calculated: a) THR — HRSI, b) THR - 
HRS2 and c) HRS2 — HRSI. The THR-points successfully 
matched in the 1* combination are entered into the matching 
of the 2" combination as so-called transfer points, i.e. only 
the coordinates in the second image are determined while the 
coordinates in the first image resulting from the previous 
matching run are kept. Accordingly, the resulting HRS2- 
points of the 2'* combination again form the transfer points 
of the 3™ combination. The points obtained from the 3 
matching runs are classified into 3 groups, depending on the 
number of combination they have been matched: 
1. in 1 combination (THR-HRS1 or THR-HRS2 only), 
2. in 2 combinations (THR-HRS1 and THR-HRS2 or 
THR-HRS2 and HRS2-HRS1) and 
3. inall 3 combinations. 
Table 1 gives a survey of the matching results achieved in 
the 8 test sites. While group 1 only contains 2-ray-points, 
group 2 contains 3-ray-points and group 3 redundant 3-ray- 
points with HRS1 coordinates matched in two different 
matching runs. The two corresponding coordinates are 
averaged and deviations from the average AX?! and AY! are 
used to calculate standard deviations Gax , Oay°!. For the 
later DSM generation only 3-ray-points were taken with a 
correlation coefficient p bigger than 0.7 and, in case of point 
group 3, with deviations AXS!, AYS! smaller than three times 
their standard deviations Gax°!, Gay”. 
From point group 3 also a subset of points is selected as input 
for the bundle adjustment using a regular grid of 100 x 100 
pixel mesh size. Taking the point with the maximum 
correlation coefficient within a grid mesh, 5267 regularly 
distributed tie points are obtained within 7 TS (see figure 3). 
From TS #2 no tie points are extracted in order to serve as a 
real check area. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Number of TS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 
2-ray-points 75643 — 152505... 71656... 79575 1196941 72379. „54551. 100053 
2-ray-points with p >0.7 39108 134013 29233 57965 103744 49391 41459 88808 
3-ray-points matched in 2 combinations 166657 205687 177825 170871 109805 136127 143485 137034 
3-ray-points in 2 combinations with p > 0.7 85497 164198 58468 113097 87566 95301 82035 117369 
Points matched in 3 combinations 728825 678645 467015 596486 768396 541319 797748 686262 
Points in 3 combinations with AS < 35,5! 595051 601042 393743 485450 678165 454615 697439 595961 
Total 3-ray-points selected for DSM generation 680548 765240 452211 598547 765731 549916 779474 713330 
  
  
Table 1: Results of region growing image matching 
446 
   
  
  
   
    
   
   
    
   
   
   
   
   
    
    
    
    
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
    
     
  
    
    
  
     
   
    
     
    
    
  
   
  
   
       
  
   
         
   
  
  
Intei 
TOW 
3.4 
In © 
eithe 
data 
impl 
(Col 
The 
give 
cam‘ 
cam 
3.4.1 
The 
the | 
to t 
defir 
Yo, 4 
  
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.