International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B1. Istanbul 2004 
  
   
  
  
  
     
las - win an a 7 
x "PIT 
ws i , ; P n x 
> m x} a € mrt 
Nus c ? ; ; 1 è 
Mose 1 n x ^» 
worin x E = =" 
a o A ud 
t A > : ^ E 
ls ; ad r : 
Le: * E 
= # 
24e 4 2 
2 x 
A ; 
of > : 
ci . 
X 
5 x 
N *- e 
» 
+ x * 
S 
* E À As - a 
  
  
<-15m 
-15 to -5 m 
  
  
   
   
     
    
  
  
<-15 m 
-15 to -5 m 
-5to«5m 
5to 15m 
  
>15m 
  
  
  
    
  
    
    
   
    
    
   
  
  
  
  
   
     
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
   
Bee = 
ite 
ees 
  
a 
a x 
+ Wie Ry, 
Ra Sh 
  
  
urban (bottom) test area from HRS stereo data. 
Figure 3: Stereo ortho photos for rural (left) and mountainous (right) area. 
  
«-15m 
-15 to -5 m 
-5to<5m 
5 to 15m 
  
> 15m 
  
Figure 2: Digital surface models (left) and difference DEMS (right) achieved for rural (top), mountainous (mid) and 
  
  
  
Internati 
38 
Figure 4 
This is « 
image n 
10% of 
areas. Ir 
of the m 
the rural 
stereo ir 
areas an 
hand the 
of 2. 
Tabk 
The dig 
these st 
differen 
given 1 
standarc 
differen 
conclus: 
Rural c 
repr 
sign 
met 
area 
Mounta 
dras 
150 
is rt 
to 5 
due 
hav 
Urban « 
oft 
up @ 
met