! A ;
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part Bl. Istanbul 2004
Table 2: Estimated parameters in along-track direction.
Bands t t» S A G2 EIFOV
Bl 69.44 73.5 47.67 | -2,04 | 24.79 66
B2 69.92 72 79 | 47.605 | -1.42 ] 23.03 67
B3/ Cl 103.4 113 58.32 -3.6 25 67
B3/C2 103.60 | 114.15 | 58.36 | -3,78 | 25.24 67
B4 85.10 101.1 | 45.86 | -4,59 | 30.52 81
Table 3: Estimated parameters in across-track direction.
Column=1 Band3 Canal Rio-Niteroi
70 ;
Column=10 Band3 Canal! Rio-Niteroi
75 : ;
roi
fi :
85 porre y ne t egeneed
E I1 x
| à ;
gl-——P RM
eI.
55 ; ; : 50 :
0 5 10: 165 A 0 5 1-45 À
Column=26 Band3 Canalt Rio-Niteroi Column=
70 70
65 er pes Lee 65
peo
e ids:
| EE 60
55 : ET 55 ! ^
0 5 10: 16 À 0 5 1 145 2
Figure 9. Along-track fitting for band 3.
Row=16 Band3 Canall Louisiana
75
IER “
EN
85] d essence]
B8 hia us
55
0 5 1045
70
65
60
55
D
75
70
65
60
75
70
65
BO t- ee tt
55 :
0 S Www
55
0
Brida center N R Bridge center ; R
| - - = LE =
eoforawidth =m. Iuter-pixel 7 20 qi
1 te 1
R R
+ t + ua 2
n A
e La § Segond deck =10 mw
leck wr tr e 1 ii. y | NE E eek ! i . m
Deck width 26.00 7 First deck: Him Crap 204. n Z
Cd I E e La m
S S I d=" —— F, T
Fig.7 Rio-Niteroi bridge model. Fig.8 Causeway bridgé model.
Bands t S of EIFOV
BI 102.03 | 89.23 | 13.61 36
B2 62.8 | 54.20 | 13.92 257
B3/ Cl 77.03 | 56.44 | 15.22 40
B3/C2 23.12 | 603 | 1521 40
B4 80.12 61.72 | 24.22 64
Row=28 Band3 Canall Louisiana
Row=73 Band3 Canal! Louisiana
Figure 10. Across-track fitting for band 3.
Internation
An origina
performanc
of the Pon
Niteroi Bri
best fit be
data. The ri
direction d:
while spati
specificatic
resolution «
3 was nol
laboratory.
of mirror v
simultaneo!
degradatior
adjacent de
band 4 we
assembly.
Banon, G.
simulation:
Satellite. S:
RPQ/665).
<dpi.inpe.b
29.
Banon, G.
SPOT and
Campos, SI
INPE, 1998
<dpi.inpe.l
29.
Bensebaa, I
spatial res
system. In
