ınbul 2004
ol. 70, No.
GIS-Based
nd Event-
X Remote
Resolution
e Sensing,
digh Sub-
PRS Joint
, Sept 19-
ixible GIS
ternational
Jeo-Based
reographic
of View,
jl. 70, No.
TJ, and
- Tool for
ographical
901. Map-
ia Spatial
> "Val 15,
ulticriteria
Action 4
10pp.
: CIS and
Suitability
15, No.2,
Geometric
Mapping
e Sensing,
f. GIS the
jn Remote
n System
oe/login ,
for The
mary and
. Proposed
"1B; amd
, Amman,
N., 2001,
yution of
rtment for
(DFID),
ENHANCING ONLINE PUBLIC NOTICES USING GIS TO FACILITATE PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENTS
Sli^'Y Ru Z. Chang*
* Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3 - (snli,
czheng)@ryerson.ca
1 + se) = 5 . es
' Intergraph Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada - yiru@ingr.com
KEY WORDS: GIS, Internet/Web, Decision Support, Environment, Design, Development
ABSTRACT:
By-laws of many municipalities and local governments require certain level of public participation in their decision-making
processes for municipal planning and development activities. One of the common practices in Canada is to hold public meetings
e
eU
during which the proposed developments are explained and discussed, and public opinions are collected. The problems associated
with existing practices are twofold: insufficient access to information required for public input and lack of effective, innovative
communication channels other than public meetings. Having municipal environmental assessment (EA) process as the application
context, this paper presents our effort on developing methodology and software tools, using advanced information technology
including GIS, that facilitate information access, understanding of EA study, and proactive participation in public meetings and,
eventually, in overall municipal class EA process.
1. INTRODUCTION
By-laws of many municipalities and local governments require
certain level of public participation in their decision-making
processes for municipal planning and development activities.
One of the common practices in Canada is to hold public
meetings, also named public information centres (PIC), during
which the proposed developments are explained and discussed,
and public opinions are collected. Based on a survey [Lawndes
et al, 2001b], public mectings are still one of the mostly
identified forms of public participation.
The problems associated with existing practices are twofold:
insufficient prior access to information required for public
input and lack of effective, innovative communication channels
other than attending public mectings. As stated in Meredith
[2000]. better access to information, better connection to
decision-making process, and better tools for getting input into
decision-making process is important questions to answer for
efficient public participation.
Recent advances of technology such as Internet and geographic
information systems (GIS) have changed many aspects of the
old traditional public participation approach [Allen, 2003; Ban.
2003; Ventura, 2003], and promise to provide new information
tools to improve participation process. While a rich collection
of publications in this area may be found from proceedings of
annual public participation GIS conferences, more relevant
examples include the electronic town meetings (ETM) using
modern computing technology such as laptops, wireless voting
pads, and groupware systems [AmericaSpeaks, 2004], web-
based GIS applications used to enhance public participation
[Evans, et al., 1999], and Web Mapper that allows collection of
public input using both HTML forms and maps (comments
geo-referenced) [Meredith, 2000]. However, few systems are
Capable of interactive manipulation of information [Evans.
Corresponding author.
269
1999], “what-if” analysis, and participant’s input, together with
access to information sufficient to make informed decisions.
Social implications of public participation in decision-making
processes have also been extensively discussed in many
publications [Lowndes, et al., 2001a and 2001b]. Among these
issues, equality in accessing information, using technologies to
manage and access information, and influencing decision-
making course, in the scope of our research, are some of the
most important considerations. Another issue is to identify
general technology impediments and provide corresponding
strategies to eliminate or reduce them [Allen, 2003; Ventura,
2003]. While the long-lasting projects may provide more
suitable testing platform for the public participation, many
municipal development projects last for a short period and
require a quick turnaround in making decisions. This also
imposes some social and economic adopting
technology-oriented solutions. The consideration must be given
based on two project dimensions: scale and time.
issues in
The research reported here concerns a GIS-based online
approach to facilitate public participation in collaborative
decision-making in various. municipal developments, by
combining public notices and out-of-meeting support
mechanisms. The focus of this paper is on the development of
methodology and software tools that facilitate. information
access, understanding of environmental assessment (EA) study,
and proactive participation in public meetings and, eventually,
in overall municipal class EA process.
We have examined existing practice of conducting public
consultation in selected municipalities in Great Toronto Area in
Canada. with respect to EA studies. Spatial requirements have
been defined and a framework of a GIS-based Internet public
notice system has been developed. It is based on this
framework that the initial prototype has been developed using
the existing Internet GlS/mapping technologies.