ul 2004
world,
Ps are
ly and
The
sed out
> spatial
pecially
inyemi,
GTGIS)
SS) for
quality
{ule
hic and
nd its
els over
ing the
-spatial
hensive
ing the
odelling
ugh an
tor for
ic data
| of the
indicate
ment
; of the
with the
cts and
TION
) assess
geted at
ifies the
poverty
nitoring
GTGIS
; of both
| in this
Mapping
i.e. the
| human
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B2. Istanbul 2004
TPoveriy inventory map ping
Figure I: Integrated poverty management concept of the
GTGIS (Source: Akinyemi, 2003)
2.2 Poverty Alleviation Module
It involves the use of geographic targeting method in
transferring benefits to poor households or neighbourhoods.
Based on the concept of Poverty Vulnerability Mapping (PVM),
the balance of factors (of strengths and weaknesses) of
households, communities and states which render them poverty
prone to varying degrees are mapped. With those vulnerability
maps, interventions can be transferred to the poor based on
where they are located using geographic targeting. Furthermore,
the household socio-economic indicators stored in the GIS
database enables the intelligent transfer of interventions based
on what their needs are, as opposed to what decision makers
think the poor need. In analysing for the PVM, households are
divided into poverty classes based on their vulnerability levels.
2.3 Poverty Monitoring Module
It is concerned with the regular monitoring of poverty
performance indicators using analysis of poverty trend between
different time periods. It evaluates the impacts of interventions
on reducing poverty over a period of time.
Tools in the three modules culminate in the ability of the system
fo manage poverty in a comprehensive manner as against the
piecemeal manner in which most systems handle the poverty
problem (Akinyemi, 2003).
3. DATA REQUIREMENT OF THE GTGIS
The GTGIS model requires data about HOUSEHOLD HEAD,
BUILDING, EMPLOYMENT, SPOUSE, STREET AND
NEIGHBOURHOOD as superclasses (regular entities). While
HEALTH, DEPENDANT (children), INFORMAL
OCCUPATION, FORMAL OCCUPATION and PENSION are
subclasses (weak entities) for the Poverty Assessment Module.
These datasets are processed as poverty levels for input into the
Poverty Alleviation Module to generate poverty maps for
households and neighbourhoods. Constructing poverty maps at
such fine level of geographic disaggregation enhances the
usefulness of poverty maps. This 1s due to the fact that
>
3
aggregated poverty data at state and local government levels
hide much variation in poverty.
These datasets are all socio-economic and demographic in
nature and are to be derived principally from census or
specialized sample surveys. Non — release of disaggregated
household level census information diminishes the usefulness of
census data (detailed household census figures are withheld for
years before release for the purpose of confidentiality). We can
resolve this problem by developing poverty maps on the basis
of welfare using indicators like access to water, education,
health etc.
Poverty at the household (micro-economic) level is the main
focus of the GTGIS system because it is at this level that the
primary manifestation of poverty occurs. Moreover, poverty at
neighbourhood, regional and national levels are but aggregates
of poverty occurrences in households. Since household poverty
is an intangible phenomenon, how do we formalize its
geometric component as a spatial object?
We opted for a vector mode of geometric representation in
which the outline of buildings housing each household is
captured as the basic unit of space to which household
information is explicitly recorded in the database (figure 2).
x
ee —
AR
a Re _
A LEE TE
i, T TN
" LE e Vs ; i
TY ——7^, A eC S. B ! A
>" . + CR AX VIL
a, 43 4 Fe
— Y V " o
M. ey Em E =
is et — TR A m
—— m « + ~1 —,
- 1 17 e A 11 % et | 5 bY
o ec EN M Aran
—7 an, ET eT IT =
X pt = =
Wor (A ci =" . BANN
ira n EN wn s ex
XX ut N m DB A e
€ — 0
es eu Y ee 4 ES e
e. .
STA AA Er
a = =
El AVS a:
ST is py
PR em I
C — | ran
— To (=: 435
SE AN X Lo =
RI oris
ES o m —
——^ * +
= = | —
a. Aa el
MM uer
—"
= x Ty e = Ta TA
nr ich 73 Vm rn D
T EM T. ^ 43.34 ft A
1 Vo T
L— Ne’ -
——n p
X Lu"
5, = + -— ix l mare
e rk i UR ^ 3
= = = A.
À
Building
Residential
Com mercial
Pe Mixed
D
Hostel
Religious
Abandoned
Ho data
Road
Figure 2: Buildings housing each household as the basic unit of
space