Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 2)

  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B2. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Figure 9: Result of the existing object analyses step of the 
change detection methodology; light grey: building 
segments for 2002 DSM, darker grey: new building, dark 
grey: demolished building 
It can be observed that in the upper right corner a new building 
was detected, whereas in the lower image part a tear off was 
recognised. In fact, the complex of three buildings in the lower 
image part was entirely destructed and (partly) rebuilt. But as 
the building at the right part of the complex was almost 
identically rebuilt concerning its shape and height, nearly no 
changes were detected; only a lower part (and therefore 
considered as a segment on its own) originally surrounding the 
building in 1997 is lacking now. 
4.3 Modified and confirmed buildings 
The segments not yet classified in this process are assumed to 
be either unchanged or modified. Inside the ground plans of the 
remaining segments, i.e. those segments not yet classified as 
not-analysable, missing or new built, the according parts of the 
DSMs are extracted and the elder data is subtracted from the 
newer one. The resulting height difference image is filtered 
using the opening operator of mathematical morphology, i.e. an 
erosion with a consecutive dilatation is performed (e.g. Haralick 
& Shapiro, 1992), regarding occurring height differences as 
foreground values. The purpose of applying the opening 
methodology is to remove single, isolated pixels or small group 
of pixels with height differences. This is because they often 
represent small objects on the roofs tops, e.g. chimneys or small 
dormers, or differences occurred due to arbitrary measurement 
deviations. 
The remaining (groups of) pixels are then classified according 
to the type of height differences. Three classes are used: 
* height difference inside the tolerance range 
* positive height difference (heightened) 
* negative height difference (decreased) 
A 
N 
Only segments containing pixels classified into the last two 
classes are further analysed. the others are considered 
unchanged. 
For each segment, as well for those linked to t, as those of t;, 
the dominating difference type is determined. If both classes 
occur in almost the same amount inside the segment, it is not 
classified; then only the altered parts are classified accordingly, 
i.e. such segments contain different classified parts. In all other 
cases, the whole segment is classified according to the 
dominating differences type, i.e. either as added-on or reduced 
building. 
  
^ 
  
  
  
  
  
Figure 10: Reduction and add- 
on at building ensemble; the 
large part in the middle was 
increased, the others 
reduced 
Figure 11: Building appearing 
heightened 
In Figure 10 a result is shown obtained for a building ensemble 
(segments of the newer data set are laid beneath in light grey). 
The middle part was heightened, whereas the surrounding parts 
were decreased. In the lower right part a large building was 
partly teared-off; the one in the middle was extended so that it 
now covers a part of the former ground plan of the reduced one. 
As the change analysis is carried out for segments of both dates 
separately, a decrease (inside the ground plan of the elder) as 
well as an increase (of the newer) segment can be determined at 
this location, visualized by mixed colours at the most right 
corner. Such, the kind of alteration can be understand better. 
Figure 11 is the representation of a building which was found to 
be heightened (by one floor). In fact, at this location a building 
was teared off and a new one erected, but exactly inside the old 
ground plan and equal shaped. Only a roofed entrance area was 
added, which appears as a bar directly beneath the building. The 
classification result is as far correct as another result can not be 
obtained regarding solely the height data. For a more precise 
raüng additional knowledge besides the laser scanning data 
would be necessary. 
5. CONCLUSIONS 
The work presented in this paper is part of a project that stands 
in the context of a disaster management tool. The projects task 
is to provide fast and reliable information about the damage 
state after strong earthquakes. Regarding this, the presented 
approach is a first attempt to detect buildings likely to be 
damaged. 
The methodology is based on laser scanning derived DSMs and 
it showed to be capable to reliably rate occurring buildings 
changes in some (rough) modification classes solely based on 
height data. New built and teared-off buildings were found 
correctly in the test area as long as they were not merged with 
Intern 
other | 
step. € 
not-alt 
Only | 
reduce 
receiv 
segme 
indepe 
alread 
Nevert 
necess 
extract 
indicat 
analys 
extract 
time, | 
prefixe 
makes 
Beside 
obtaine 
purpos 
change 
used e. 
in urba 
Signifi 
applyir 
segmer 
segmet 
compai 
with th 
To imp 
areas, t 
improv 
For ins 
several 
already 
models 
Altan, 
MOLAI 
Istanbu 
Remote 
Hydera 
Bhattac 
D. and 
study © 
In: JAP 
on CD. 
CRC 4 
Center 
and 
karlsrut 
Haralic] 
vision. ' 
Jung, F 
aerial 
Remote
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.