ment of ; 
‚ratefully Line #|dX (m)|dY (m)|dZ (m) dX (m)[dY (m)| dZ (m) 
RR 1 | 0.023 | 0.077 | 0.013 Invariance | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.002 
LION ON 2 | 0.041 | 0.033 | 0.070 
3 0.069 | 0.008 | 0.041 2-Photo Block| 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.000 
4 0.031 | 0.042 | 0.004 
5 0.454 | 0.512 | 0.123 Table 6 RMS at 20 Check Points for Invariance and 
HY 6 0.207 | 0.118 ) 0.288 Photogrammetric Methods for Object Reconstruction Using 
7 0.019 | 0.066 | 0.045 6 Control Points (Purduc Campus, Real Data, 1:4000) 
M., 1995. 8 0.648 | 0.245 | 0.411 
ammetry 9 0.042 | 0.056 | 0.019 Z 
5 : : : dX (m)ldY (m)| dZ (m 
udo, FL, 10 | 0.018 | 0.042 | 0.177 GR Y (n7 em) 
1:394 Invariance | 0.323 | 0.297 | 0.739 
> ; Table 1 RMS at 5 Points on cach Check Line c 
- ; ; .689 
. ISPRS Two Photo Block solving for E.O. Parameters 2 Photo Elock] 0:030 10557 | 005 
| Using 10 Control Lines + 10 Pass Lines (S1) ; . 
8 1094: Table 7 RMS at 11 Check Points for Invariance 
d Object and Photogrammetric Methods for Object Reconstruction 
, Vol. II, Line £|dX (m)|dY (m)|dZ (m) Using 6 Control Points (Bangor, 1:8660) 
atiuship 1 | 0.045 | 0.085 | 0.017 
n. SPIE 2 0.008 | 0.060 | 0.013 Line Z|dX (m)|dY (m)|dZ (m) 
; 3 | 0.075 | 0.044 | 0.052 
Feat 4 | 0.094 | 0.085 | 0.015 Le EM at A on 
pes 5 | 032 | 0395 | 0.108 2 | 0.139 | 0.515 | 0.168 
aS. 6 | 0310 | 0.184 | 0.505 Sa DE 
; Mm 4 0.005 | 0.049 | 0.408 
resd:ifor 7 0.041 | 0.099 | 0.063 
5 0.060 | 0.109 | 0.461 
npletion 8 0.612 | 0.216 0.403 
peo 9 | 0.106 | 0.080 | 0.027 6... 0218.1 0124.1. 06/0 
Stage 10 | 0.170 | 0.043 | 0.131 71.611: |.0.286:{: 3,240 
quaes; 8 | 0.003 | 0.035 | 0.119 
9 1.375 | 0.981 | 7.148 
1988. Table 2 RMS at 5 Points on each Check Line : 
Features. Two Photo Block solving for LO.+E.0. ; 
s oe Sn yng Gur o parameters Table 4 RMS at 5 Points on cach Check Line Two 
Using 10 Control Lines+10 Pass Lines (S2) ; n : 
'RS. The Photo Block solving for E.O. Parameters Using 6 Control 
Analysis Lines + 9 Pass Lines (Bangor, Rcal Data, 1:8660) 
  
  
Photo #| Aw(deg) | Ah (deg) | Ax(deg) | AX,(n) | AY, (m) | AZ, (m) 
  
1 0.254 0.070 -0.006 -0.729 -1.182 2.621 
  
2 -0.043 -0.074 0.002 -1.663 0.939 2.216 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 3 Differences in Camera Parameters - Two Photo Block using 
6 Control Lines and 9 Pass Lines - Real Data (Bangor (1:8660)) 
  
  
Convergent (C) Geometry||Normal (N) Geometry 
dX (m) |dY (m)| dZ (m) [dX (m)ldY (m)|dZ(m) 
  
  
  
  
Original Invariance| 3.855 | 4.007 | 3.165 || 0.196 | 0.089 | 0.320 
  
Modified Invariance| 0.307 0.169 | 0.408 I 0.112 | 0.045 | 0.315 
  
  
  
2-Photo Block 0.033 | 0.029 | 0.001 I 0.034 | 0.037 | 0.136 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 5 RMS at 16 Check Points for Invariance and Photogrammetric Mcthods for 
Object Reconstruction Using 6 Control Points - Simulated perturbed Data (0.01 mm) 
541 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B3. Vienna 1996