International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B2. Istanbul 2004
less computation time. In these two test cases, the tolerance of
model error is selected as 0.05 pixels. Thus, the patch for both
sensors should be 160m by 160m and the terrain variation
should be smaller than 500m.
Model error of test data
0.13 —-
—$— QuickBird 160m* 160m (266pixel*266pixel)
e ip SPOTS 160m*160m (64pixel*64pixel)
2
=
= 0.08
5
— 005
©
Me)
o
= 0.03
0.00 i re i
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Variance of Terrain(meter)
Figure 11. Model error of test data
3.2 Accuracy Analysis
The ray-tracing method is applied to evaluate the orbit accuracy.
Given the satellite orientation and image point, we calculate the
intersection point of DTM and ray direction. We provide Table
3 for the summary of accuracy. Table 3 illustrates the accuracy
performance of GCPs and CHKPs, when 9 GCPs were
employed. The accuracy of SPOTS and QuickBird are better
than two pixels.
Table 3. Root-Mean-Square error of orbit modeling
GCP CHKP
Unit: meter |GSD |RMSE E |RMSEN |RMSEE |RMSEN
SPOTS 2.5. |1.78 1.96 3.98 3.12
QuickBird |0.6 |0.55 0.48 0.71 0.87
In order to evaluate the quality of orthoimage, we checked it by
enough number of check points. Table 4 shows the RMSE of
orthoretification. It is observed that the RMSE behaves
similarly to orbit modeling. The orthoimage and error vectors
of SPOTS are illustrated in Figure 12 and Figure 13. The
orthoimage and error vectors of QuickBird are illustrated in
Figure 14 and Figure 15. Please note that the accuracy results
of orthoimages are similar to those in orbit modeling. This
indicates that the accuracy loss is insignificant.
3
x 10
T T T T T T T |
7 |
279r ; 4
|
|
2.785 j- — 1
x x i|
278 ; \ H
i x |
t |
ty | x |
2775+ 3 X
2775 & : x X 7
> X x. # |
X \ UN
= x |
27r A x 1
; | | e cs
7 3m x X d
© ca: aly
+ * x
276- X 3 Y 3
A = T |
X
2755} > a ^ 1
^x = |
= |
"5L 4
+ X -— |
\ ;
XE
27451
/ |
£F |
274m =
Sd L | t | 1 1 | |
25 26 27 28 28 3 3.1 32
x 10°
Figure 12. Error Vector for Generated SPOTS Orthoimage
590
5
x 10
T
e
N
MN
5
ci
N
T
Interna
orthore
is appli
calcula
be less
Figure
terrain
actual |
elevatic
terrain
smaller
160m*
elevatic
analyze
varianc
patch s:
QuickB
minute:
Compu
Patch S
Patch S
Orthoin
1
Figure 14. Error Vector for Generated QuickBird Orthoimage
Figure 15. Generated QuickBird Orthoimage
1 1 1
282 284 295 28
x 10°
Orthoin
We us
Backpr
variatio
do the
result i:
Backpre
and bot
spent 5:
than 10
Te
Comput:
(min)
Terrain
(m)
Patch siz
Terrain
in a patcl
Number
3.4 Su
The ex
scheme
than 0.0
2 pixel