Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 2)

nbul 2004 
ayload of 
)4 several 
| period is 
vs for an 
ayload by 
ng years. 
ht HALE 
V flight 
) intends 
of the 
esolution 
| that not 
)pe. 
; in mind 
nption of 
1ed or are 
arable in 
he basic 
  
  
| camera. 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B2. Istanbul 2004 
Based on the standards for laser altimetry currently used in The 
Netherlands and Flanders, a similar set of requirements is 
obtained for the aerial laserscanner (Table 3).At a nominal 
flying altitude of 14 km, with a ceiling of 18 km albeit with 
perhaps restricted capabilities, a scanangle of 6? is foreseen so 
that the swath widths of multispectral camera and the 
laserscanner coincide. The complete payload description and 
the UAV issues are described elsewhere (Everaerts et al., 2004). 
  
Pulse frequency [5 kHz 
Laser beam divergence «0.1 mrad 
Scan frequency At least 10 Hz 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Scan mode Nutating 
[ntensity Yes 
Multiple reflections Yes 
Data volume 26 Mbit/s 
Estimated weight «5 kg 
  
  
  
  
Continuous use on daily basis | at least 8 h during equinox 
  
Table 3. Basic requirements for the laser altimeter 
3.3 Ground segment 
Based on previous experience at Vito with the Processing and 
Archiving Facility for several satellite sensors, a centralized 
ground processing center linked to multiple ground rececption 
stations will be installed (one reception station supports the 
HALE UAV in a radius of 200 km). One of the key features of 
the PEGASUS system is the centralized data processing from 
level 0 (raw data) to level 2 and level 3 data under standardized 
quality control procedures. This centralized and qualified 
ground segment guarantees users across Europe the same high- 
quality data as presently delivered by satellite data providers. 
This is not the case in the aerial survey business world where 
only the instruments are standardized, as there are just a few 
large manufacturers left (e.g. Leica Geosystems and Z/I 
Imaging for aerial cameras). 
The multispectral data will not have stereo capability, due to the 
narrow view angle. The stereo aspect will be generated from the 
overlay of the multispectral data with the aerial laserscan data 
as elevation measurements derived from aerial laserscan data 
have a higher accuracy and consistency than those derived 
through photogrammetry at the same flying height. Therefore 
stereo multispectral data will be available but as a level 3 data, 
i.e. after merging the laserscan data with the multispectral data. 
4. BUSINESS MODEL 
The main features characterizing the business model of the 
PEGASUS project can be summarized as follow: 
The PEGASUS project, by its targeted ground resolution, offers 
an alternative for aerial photography and aerial laserscanning 
data from a photo scale of 1:8 000 and smaller. These data will 
be comparable to and compatible with present-day modern 
digital airborne systems like Leica ADS 40, Leica ALS 40. 
ele... 
Because several complete overpasses and observations per year 
will be performed and be made available to end-users across 
Europe, all required data will usually be available immediately. 
Even for disaster monitoring, nearly real-time data from the 
hovering UA V’s will be available to the decision makers. 
627 
There will be one centralized and quality-assured system for the 
whole of Europe. This system will respond to the highest 
quality standards set for large scale digital mapping (the GRB- 
standard in Flanders and the elevation mapping standards in the 
Netherlands and Flanders). This will ensure mapping agencies 
and end-users of the desired quality without needing to wait for 
the appropriate flight season or the availability of sensors, or 
buying expensive equipment themselves. This centralized and 
quality-assured system will rely mostly on fully automated 
procedures for the production of data up to level 2, with 
substantial manual or semi-automated data quality checks and 
re-runs. The future is clearly for a centralized (state-wise or 
European wide) data and information provider with certified 
quality-approved production systems, standardized across 
Europe. All the data and subsequently derived information 
products will be available to both end-users and OEMs. This 
allows for a large dissemination and use of RS data in the 
society as a whole and not just among the current specialist 
users. OEMs will be able to define their own level 3 data. 
The data will be delivered at a cost significantly lower than 
presently by wholly owned data acquisition. This is due to a 
better time-use and hence lower operating cost than present-day 
systems. Indeed, a specific UAV is targeted for a survey area 
varying between 100 000 km2 and 150 000 km2 at an system 
acquisition cost, inclusive of payload, of approximately 10 M€. 
This amount is significantly lower than the acquisition costs for 
the multitude of aircrafi, digital and analog cameras and 
laserscanners presently needed to cover the same area.. 
Furthermore, both digital and analog cameras are only used 
under *blue sky" conditions (1/8 of cloud cover and preferably 
less). No data acquisition is undertaken when cloudy patterns 
are observed or forecast as the cost for mobilizing crew, 
aircraft, operating cost of the aircraft, etc., are too high 
compared to the potential profit of data collection. In contrast 
the UAV will hover continuously over the area and collect data 
as soon as any area of 2 x 2 km” (on the ground) can be 
recorded cloud-free. This leads to vastly expanded operating 
hours as compared to today's airborne systems. 
Moreover, the use of fully automated and/or semi-automated 
data QA/QC lowers the production cost of the data and 
information even further. More integrated automated solutions 
can be used because of : 
l. the integrated design of the different sensors by the 
same manufacturer, 
the completely digital set-up of all sensors and data- 
acquisition, and 
3. the large development effort on the part of payload 
manufacturer i.c. Vito, as a research organization, to 
also spend considerable time improving the data 
processing algorithms. 
Io 
Traditional hardware manufacturers only provide the hardware, 
but seldomly the automated tools to ensure quality-approved 
information collection. 
Vito, as founding and chief scientific partner in the PEGASUS- 
project, has growing evidence of this theory in its own running 
data-information dissemination policy with regard to 
VEGETATION satellite data. 
Figure 4 shows the dramatic increase of subscribed users to the 
centralized VEGETATION satellite-data and -products once the 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.