tanhul 2004
ich is often
and image
? gradually
se for less
y extracted
'S are very
e was also
; much less
0-cm pixel
data, but
e only by
ght quality
editing, so
onsidered.
ADS40
30cm
5.27
4.24
2.08
site.
> (a), but
nage (b).
the white
nage (a),
ack lines
| are the
| is high
im pixel
ost l:1
depends
y of the
po with
density
] in 3-4
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B2. Istanbul 2004
hours on a Dell PC with Pentium 4, 2GHz CPU and 2GB RAM
running Windows XP. Thus, using this not up-to-date computer
configuration, all 1:25,000 map sheets of Switzerland could be
processed in 36 days. Note that typical map sheets, excluding
large urban centers, large lakes and the Alps, have about 2,500
km of roads, with about 4595-5094 of them in rural areas.
4.2 Geneva Site
Our system achieves good results with the 50-cm orthoimage
(Swissimage), similar to the ones in Thun (see Table 3).
However, the performance (mainly the completeness) with the
HRS data is poor, especially the 1-m IKONOS image. In this
image, higher-class roads are usually extracted, while most
narrow roads such as 4", 5? and 6" class roads are not, because
the system prerequisite of 3 pixel wide roads is not fulfilled.
The increased ground resolution in Quickbird makes more roads
visible than in IKONOS, and also the road surface and road
edges are clearer, resulting in a better performance. However,
compared with the 60-cm aerial film orthoimage in Thun, the
completeness is still rather low.
Quality Aerial | 1K ONOS-PSM | Quickbird-PSM
measures 50cm 100cm 70cm
Completeness [90.89% [54.22% 72.68%
Correctness 95.36% {81.22% 89.58%
Length of 50.72 50.72 50.72
reference (km)
Length of 48.35 33.87 42.16
extraction (km)
RMS x 0.62 0.93 0.81
error (m) y (0.56 0.82 0.75
Mean x 10.07 -0.73 -0.44
error (m) | y |-0.05 0.34 0.50
Process time (s) |1510 992 924
Table 3. Quality evaluation of the results in Geneva site.
It is apparent that the definition quality of an object does not
depend only on the pixel size but other image quality factors
too, and that each object type can be favourably extracted
within an object-specific image scale range. Critical factors
influencing image quality, like atmospheric and illumination
conditions, sensor and sun elevation and image sharpness are
much less or not controllable with spaceborne sensors compared
to airborne ones, resulting thus in inferior image quality and
object definition with the former, even if the ground pixel size
is similar. Both HRS images lead to accuracy (RMS) of less
than 1m. The mean values are high, due to a systematic bias
caused by probable errors in the transformation from the
coordinate system of Canton Geneva to the Swiss coordinate
system. Thus, in reality the road accuracy from the HRS images
is similar or slightly better than that from Swissimage, if the
HRS orthoimages are produced with a submeter accuracy
DSM/DTM (as in this case) or the sensor elevation is high. Fig.
8 shows several examples of extracted roads and road junctions
from the Swissimage, IKONOS and Quickbird orthoimages.
In the Geneva test site, no extraction is applied to the roads
inside the villages since the sizes of the villages are large and
are classified as urban area. The non-extracted roads are usually
those in fields with very weak edges. An example is given in
Fig. 9. False extraction in Swissimage occurs when a road in
fields is neighbouring with road-like lines (Fig. 10a). Several
false extractions are also because the actual road width differs
from the width expected for the given road class. This was
; © | ;
noticed with several 5" and 6" class roads. An example is
shown in Fig. 10b, where a ca. 6.6-m wide 5" class road is
incorrectly extracted
Figure 8. Examples of extracted roads and road junctions in the
Geneva site orthoimages. The black lines are the
results and the white lines are the VEC25 roads. Left:
Swissimage, middle: IKONOS, right: Quickbird.
s
Figure 9. Road in field with weak edges can not be extracted
from Swissimage. Black line: reference data. White
line: VEC25 roads.
Figure 10. Examples of false extraction from Swissimage.
Black line: extraction results. White lines: reference
data. (a) a road is incorrectly extracted due to the
interference of many road-like features. (b) false
extraction caused by assuming wrong road width for
the given road class,