A SOLUTION FOR THE GENERAL CASE OF THE THREE-IMAGE ORIENTATION
Alice Pozzoli, Luigi Mussio, Marco Scaioni
Politecnico di Milano, Dept. LI.A.R., P.za Leonardo da Vinci, 32 - 20133 Milano, Italy
e-mail: {alice.pozzoli, luigi.mussio, marco.scaioni}@polimi.it
Commission III, WG I11/1
KEY WORDS: Photogrammetry, Orientation, Adjustement, Precision, Accuracy, Reliability, Vision, Education
ABSTRACT:
In an easy solution for three - image orientation, each model coming from two images of a triplet is analyzed and the relative
orientation between them computed, by using an exhaustive research of preliminary values of its parameters. This non-conventional
approach supplies the orientation of two images, taking into account a priori information among four base solutions. The automatic
procedure of orientation wants to skip the manual assessment by using three images, which would allow to solve for the ambiguous
solutions. Once each model has been relatively registered, the absolute orientation is computed by using a linear parameterization of
this problem.
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Orientation procedures in photogrammetry
Orientation procedures play a fundamental role in the object
reconstruction process of photogrammetry. Traditionally, the
call for stereo-vision leaded to setup a geometric solution based
on interior and relative orientations, which are the pre-requisite
for any further task to extract information from a pair of images.
The former refers to the determination of 3 intrinsic parameters
(principal distance and coordinates of principal point in the
camera reference system), the latter to the computation of the
baseline vector linking two perspective centres and relative
rotation of one image with respect to the other; the number of
unknown parameters adds up to 5, which usually follow one of
two geometric model, namely the symmetric and asymmetric
one. By introducing the knowledge of ground information (e.g.
GCPs) the absolute orientation can be computed and the model
computed from relative orientation can be transformed into the
real world, or to a scaled representation of this such a
topographic map. Research on this topic has been attracting the
interest of photogrammetrists in the first mid of 20" century
(Finsterwalder, 1899; Fourcade, 1926; Kruppa, 1913).
From the 50's to 70's, mathematical fundamentals of analytical
photogrammetry were established. New formulations of two-
image orientation were published (Semple & Kneebone, 1952;
Thompson, 1959; Stefanovic, 1973), while the unexplored field
of aerial triangulation began to be dealt with (Schmid, 1954;
Schut, 1955-56).
Two topic aspects have to be focused concerning orientation
procedures in photogrammetry up the so called "analytical era":
e the use of analogue imagery and of purely manual
measurement for orientation purposes, resulting in the use
of a small set of accurate points for computing relative
and absolute orientation; this fact limits the problem of
blunders to a small number of gross errors (due to wrong
labelling, image content misunderstanding and the like)
and to a low fraction of small errors.
e orientation problems such as formulated in
photogrammetry are non-linear and they are usually
902
solved by a Least Squares approach, after a linearization
of equations. In this way, L.S. adjustments can run
automatically and more refined treatments (e.g. robust
procedures and re-weighted L.S.) can be performed, step
by step, always solving linear systems. It is obvious that
all methods can start only if the preliminary values of the
unknown parameters are known. Aerial blocks feature
regular shapes, so that approximations may be easily
derived, because the project for data acquisition define
these parameters with a sufficient accuracy, or auxiliary
measurements are available at the time of data acquisition.
But also close-range blocks, up to 70's show
configurations, which are very similar to those of aerial
photogrammetry, offering the same possibility to solve for
approximations.
These statements will result fundamental to comprehend the
changes introduced in photogrammetric orientation approaches
in the following decades.
Since the 80's a new challenge defied the community of
photogrammetrists, given by the possibility of managing and
processing digital images by computers. Whether the concept of
a totally digital stereo-plotter (Sarjakoski, 1981) became in few
years a reality, on the other hand automation of all analytical
orientation procedures was the topic research issue up to the
end of 1900 (for a review see Heipke, 1997).
1.2 Photogrammetry meets Machine Vision
The development of digital photogrammetry is parallel to that
of machine and robot vision techniques. Here the problem of
object reconstruction is needed for specialized and real-time
purposes, such as object recognition, production and quality
control, vehicle and robot guidance an so on, not for deriving
cartography of however a wider description of the space. This
fact limits the number of digital sensors to be used to the
minimum: in case of objects lying in a plane, a single image, in
case of 3D object a two-image configuration will be adopted,
tuning the interest on relative orientation procedure. For this
reason, many algorithms have been developed to cope with this
task, keeping into account the possibility of solving for any
geometric configuration (no approximation needed) and the use
Inte.
——
of 1
line:
esse
func
inte
to IT
diff
this
The
Sew
poir
equ:
tech
surf.
Nev
fron
hom
cons
relat
thro
fens
Aloi
Ress
appr
oriel
effe
from
How
geor
1.3
In th
imag
phot
tens
thos
oriet
have
simi
In IV
prob
of p:
Expl
the |
This
func
and |