Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

  
  
  
  
  
    
INVESTIGATION OF GEOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS FOR MATCHING HICH 
RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES 
P. M. Dare 
Airborne Research Australia, Flinders University, PO Box 335, Salisbury South, SA 5106, AUSTRALIA 
Paul.Dare@AirborneResearch.com.au 
Commission III, WG 11/2 
KEY WORDS: Ikonos; DEM/DTM; Matching; High resolution; Satellite imagery 
ABSTRACT 
The creation of digital surface models from stereo imagery is a well-understood procedure that is central to digital photogrammetric 
processing. Recently, however, attention has focused on the creation of surface models from high resolution satellite imagery, which 
is not quite so straightforward due to the specific attributes of spaceborne imaging systems, and the fact that some data suppliers do 
not release details of the sensor and camera models. This paper describes a matching procedure for creating digital surface models 
(DSMs) from stereo imagery acquired by the high resolution Ikonos satellite. Central to this matching procedure are the geometric 
constraints that are commonly used to reduce the search space and hence constrain the matching solution. Results are presented of 
the use of two different geometric constraints (one image space constraint, and one object space constraint) applied to two very 
different Ikonos stereopairs. A range of digital surface models were created, which, when compared to reference data, showed height 
differences of less than a few metres. Furthermore, visual evaluation of the resulting surface models showed that both geometric 
constraints yielded a good representation of the true surface. 
1. INTRODUCTION 
The topic of automatic image matching, especially for the 
purpose of surface modelling, has received considerable 
attention for many years. (For a concise historical summary, the 
reader is referred to Samadzadegan, 2002.) Although many 
early problems associated with image matching have been 
resolved by the development of new algorithms, or the 
application of high-end technology, new issues continue to 
arise. The majority of previous image matching research, from 
a geometric point of view at least, has utilised aerial 
photography or moderate resolution satellite imagery (such as 
SPOT panchromatic data). Nowadays the wide availability of 
high resolution stereo satellite imagery means that image 
matching can be thoroughly investigated. The different 
attributes of these sensors, as compared to aerial photography, 
mean that new problems have to be resolved, and hence new 
algorithms or matching strategies have to be developed. 
Matching conjugate points in high resolution stereo satellite 
imagery is more challenging than in air photos due to the far 
more limited opportunities for satellite image acquisition. 
Aerial photography that is recorded for the purpose of 
topographic mapping would always be acquired under ideal 
conditions, namely good illumination, appropriate base to 
height ratio for the level of terrain undulation, and correct scale 
for the ground features being imaged. With high resolution 
satellite imaging these parameters can rarely be changed. 
Illumination is dependent upon season and latitude (time of day 
is fixed by orbital parameters); base to height ratio is set by the 
satellite operator; and, scale is fixed by sensor resolution, 
orbital height and look angle. 
The two main consequences of the difference between 
automatic image matching with high resolution satellite 
imaging, and with aerial photography, are firstly that alternative 
matching strategies may be required to account for the lack of 
sensor orientation information, and secondly that results cannot 
be expected to be as good as those from aerial photography (a 
result confirmed by Fraser et al., 2001; Fraser et al., 2002a). 
This paper presents the results of a study which investigated 
different matching strategies for pairs of Ikonos images. In 
particular, the study has focussed on methods used to constrain 
the search space. As a result, two different geometric 
constraints have been evaluated. The first constraint, based on 
epipolar geometry, operates in image space, and can be applied 
to all images, whether or not they are aligned to epipolar 
coordinates. The second constraint is based on the affine 
projective model (Fraser et al, 2002b), which like rational 
polynomial coefficients (RPCs), maps image space coordinates 
to object space coordinates. Matching is constrained by limiting 
the search for conjugate points along vertical nadir lines in the 
stereomodel. By applying these constraints to two Ikonos 
stereopairs, the relative advantages and disadvantages of each 
constraint have been compared. 
2. THE AFFINE PROJECTIVE MODEL 
The affine projective model is somewhat similar to the RPC 
model in that it relates image space coordinates to object space 
coordinates without any knowledge of the sensor model or 
exterior orientation (EO). The general form of the model 
describing an affine transformation from 3D object space 
(X, Y, Z) to 2D image space (x, y) for a given point i is expressed 
as: 
xX; = Aj X; + A»Y, + A3L; + Ay 
(1) 
This model comprises eight parameters per image, these 
accounting for translation, rotation, and non-uniform scaling 
and skew distortion. Implicit in (1) are two projections, one 
    
    
     
    
  
   
   
International Archi 
MC 
scaled-orthogonal 
resolution satellite 
Quickbird with nari 
projection is paralle 
practical tests to be 
the reported implen 
model parameters 
triangulated ground 
photogrammetric bu 
3. D/ 
Two pairs of satelli 
stereo pair of Ikonc 
geometry by the de 
over the city of Mel 
does not vary signif 
sea level and the h 
The Central Busine 
area, and contains b 
imagery depicts wal 
stereopair is shown | 
  
Figure 
The second image | 
Ikonos stereopair of 
covered a wide ; 
approximately 7km 
region was chosen i 
to the Melbourne d 
terrain, vegetation | 
of this stereopair is <
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.