t B3. Istanbul 2004 
Zo[m] 
0.04 
0.02 
0.02 
0.02 
0.01 
0.04 
0.01 
0.00 
0.01 
0.02 
0.01 
0.02 
0.01 
0.02 
0.02 
9.01 
).01 
).03 
).01 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
ual strips. Strips 
P, strips from the 
lock and indicates 
sable to consider 
test for variations 
ere computed for 
: reveal significant 
suit here. A more 
ces have indicated 
rrive from angular 
The magnitude of 
equire treatment. 
eir elimination. 
ta and eliminating 
c errors from the 
es removing both 
efore takeoff and 
y using a system 
e actual errors in 
:d model offers a 
errors as it con- 
he selection of a 
| topography and 
ljustment and do 
n region. Results 
7 20 strips among 
rip” pattern have 
psitional offsets in 
than the ones in 
|, 2003. Estimat- 
ta with local 3D- 
ammetry and Re- 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
Figure 3: Offsets between two strips before and after the 
adjustment 
Positional offsets for the cross strips 
Eh Wir Per 
  
Magnitude [m] 
  
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
Strip number 
Figure 4: Graph of the positional offset magnitude for the 
Cross strips 
  
  
mote Sensing. 34(3-W13), 20-26. 
Burman, H., 2002. Laserstrip adjsutment for data calibration 
and verification. International Archives of Photogrammetry 
and Remote Sensing, 34(3A): 67-72. 
Crombaghs, M., E. De Min and R. Bruegelmann, 2000. On 
the Adjustment of Overlapping Strips of Laser Altimeter 
Height Data. International Archives of Photogrammetry 
and Remote Sensing, 33(B3/1): 230-237. 
Filin, S., 2002, Surface clustering from airborne laser scan- 
ning data. International Archives of Photogrammetry and 
Remote Sensing. 34(3A):117-124. 
Filin, S., 2003. Recovery of Systematic Biases in Laser Altime- 
try Data Using Natural Surfaces. Photogrammetric Engi- 
neering & Remote Sensing, 69(11), 1235-1242. 
Filin, S., 2003, Analysis and Implementation of a laser strip 
adjustment model /nternational Archives of Photogramme- 
try and Remote Sensing. 34(3-W13), 65-70. 
Kager, H. and Kraus, K., 2001. Hieght discrepancies between 
overlapping laser scanner strips. Proceedings of Optical 
3D Measurement Techniques V, October, Vienna, Austria: 
103-110. 
Kornus, W. and Ruiz, A., 2003. Strip adjustment of LiDAR 
data./nternational Archives of Photogrammetry and Re- 
mote Sensing. 34(3-W13), 47-50. 
Ridgway, J. R., J. B. Minster, N. Williams, J. L. Bufton and 
W. B. Krabill, 1997. Airborne Laser Altimeter Survey of 
Long Valley California. Int. J. Geophysics, 131: 267-280. 
Schenk, T., 2001. Modeling and analyzing systematic errors 
of airborne laser scanners. Technical Notes in Photogram- 
metry No. 19, Department of Civil and Environmental En- 
gineering and Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, 
Columbus, OH., 40 pages. 
Vaughn, C. R., J. L. Bufton, W. B. Krabill and D. L. Rabine, 
1996. Georeferencing of Airborne Laser Altimeter Measure- 
ments. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 17(11): 2185-2200. 
  
  
  
A 
EEE 
  
Se