International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing
Point dN(m) | dE(m) | dR(m) | dh(m)
RN02 0030 | 0.215 | 0216 | 0.085
RN03 -0.215 | -0019 | 0.216 | 0.053
RN08 -0.006 0.136 | 0.136 | -0.050
RN09 -0.001 0.121 0.121 | -0.009
RN12 0.321 -0.120 | 0.343 | -0.168
RN14 -0.227 0.315 0.388 | -0.133
RN21 -0.032 -0.397 | 0.398 | 0.013
RN23 -0.169 1 -0:130 1 9.213 0.192
mean -0.044 0.015 | 0.254 | -0.002
s.d. 0.164 0214 | 0.102 | 0.100
Table 1. LIDAR verification
4.2 Triangulation
Firstly, utilizing intensity image (Figure 5.3) and aerial image
(Figure 5.b), thirty-five details that were identifiable in both
images and that were in the necessary geometric position to
carry out triangulation were selected, as shown in Figure 4. To
meet the search criteria in the original Laser Scanner data, these
points were always defined on the top of the objects selected.
Utilizing the program ENVI 3.4 and the intensity image, the
planimetric coordinates (approximate) of the points selected
were extracted;
- employing the same procedure used in item 4.1, the
planimetric coordinates of thirty five points selected were
determined in the original text file proceeding from the Laser
Scanner;
- exemplifying the procedure for Point 8, of approximate
coordinates E — 677677.76 m and N = 7184398.63 m, one has
in Table 2 the selected points in a 1 m ray circle.
Point E(m) N(m) h(m) d(m)
8.1 677677.540 | 7184398.420 | 924.310 | 0.304
8.2 677678.230 | 7184398.830 | 923.660 | 0.511
8.3 677677.210 | 7184399.140 | 914.750 | 0.750
8.4 677678.520 | 7184398.320 | 923.560 | 0.821
8.5 677677.690 | 7184397.800 | 924.470 | 0.833
8.6 671611.660 | 7184399.600 | 919.830 | 0.975
Table 2. Original coordinates researched for the Point 8.
Table 2 shows that point 8.1 meets the criteria of proximity and
highest altitude.
Out of the group of thirty-five points, nine points of planimetric
control in the periphery of the block were selected, twenty-one
of altimetric control and five of verification. Employing the
program ENVI 3.4, the manual reading of the photogrammetric
points selected in the thirteen images taking part of the block to
be triangulated was performed. The coordinates were obtained
in the digital system and next transformed into the
photogrametric system with proper corrections of systematic
errors. Finally, the processing of triangulation with the program
BundleH was conducted. As far as the ground control points
and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004
existing in the triangulated block are concerned, it was decided
that the control points planialtimetrically constrainted occupied
the periphery of the block, so as to be minimum in number and
to leave the biggest area possible in the interior of this block
occupied by point with altimetric constraint.
The final distribution of the triangulated points and of
verification (without any constraint), may be observed in Figure
4.
NORTH
Figure 3. Block of Digital Images from Sony DSC-F717.
218
; XYZCONSTRAINT— _%
ny rad
VERIFICATION POINT
216 S NO TRIANGULATED
NORTH 5
215 ; 8
12 >
. 214 = à
IMAGES : Lo 3
A ; e ond X
213 A. m A y ZA
23 . A
f CA
212 À A A 7A
s 2 A i
u^ A ;
; A NA zi
4 \ A A
A * v ^
3 35
KS u
À i A
STRIP 2 A y A \ Que. od
229 Mee | 195
FREE POINT —— ap NA 197 Z CONSTRAINT
s
STRIP 1 198 ‚MAGES
; 199
. Figure 4. Triangulated Block.
International Archi
POINT 8
(a)
Figure 6 — (a) LID
central area); (b) det
detail of the Point 8
The results obtaine
within the precisio:
observations and fi
Firstly, a global an
considered utilizing
on the a priori (1.0
was verified that t
conducted are all be
the terrain. Compa
altimetric constrain
triangulation and the
is verified in Table
meters, with standarc
of the points tested 2
cm and 10094 of th
displays the results o
case, the planimetric
significant considerir
standard deviation o
the planimetric accut
is around 75 cm and :
6. CONCLUSK
The results obtained
to the following conc
- the methodology er
and determination «
control for triangulati
- low-cost digital c
aerophotogrammetric
- the utilization of nor
I$ promising for futur
- the utilization of th:
consistent and efficier
- the integration of I
with small-format dig
considering the prog
sensors of these came
surveyed with LIDAR