Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

    
   
  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004 
  
3.3 Cross Strips 
Based on multi-strip test two cross strips were added into the 
block for these strategies test: 
e Different section number 
e Different GCP number 
€ Different GCP configuration 
Total 66 GCPs, 1189 pass points and tie points were measured in 
semi-auto matching method. Table 5 and 6 list the obtained 
results in different subsection length and different GCP number. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Section RMS X (m) | RMS Y (m) RMS Z 
Length (m) 
om 0.064 0.08 0.168 
30000 0.073 0.095 0.181 
40000 0.079 0.116 0.173 
0000 0.075 0.123 0.164 
100009 0.156 0.184 0.228 
be 0.221 0.193 0.238 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 5. Statistics associated with different section number. 
From this table we find the shorter the subsection, the more 
accurate the results. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
GCP RMS X(m) | RMS Y (m) RMS Z 
Number (m) 
2 GCP A 0.112 0.1401 0.187 
2 GCP B 0.095 0.145 0.166 
2:GCP C 0.107 0.136 0.226 
3 GCP A 0.127 0.144 0.193 
S GCPB 0.105 0.181 0.1901 
4 GCP 0.106 0.135 0.199 
S:GCP 0.097 0.154 0.183 
6 GCP 0.102 0.134 0.193 
8 GCP 0.095 0.145 0.166 
H GEP 0.107 0.126 0.198 
12-GCP 0.0907 0.124 0.217 
All GCP 0.073 0.095 0.181 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 6. Statistics associated with different GCP number. 
From this table we find the more the GCPs in same subsection 
length, the more accurate the results. 
Comparing Table 3 with 5 and Table 4 with 6 we also find even 
though the number of GCPs, pass points and tie points are same, 
the accuracy of planimetry and height for cross strips have 
been improved considerably due to the geometric conditions 
have been strengthened. 
4 Conclusion 
The growing demand for fast and accurate data acquisition for 
mapping and GIS applications requires the provision of new 
sensors with a high automatic mapping potential as the digital 
photogrammetry has been widely used to produce various digital 
mapping data and orthoimages in last decade years. Airborne 
TLS imaging system has proven the concept of stereo and multi 
spectral mapping using three-linear pushbroom CCD arrays 
since 2D CCD array imaging systems with a comparable size 
and resolution have not been available presently and are not 
likely to be available in the future. However, these image data 
collected by the TLS imaging system can only be useful if the 
geometric relationship between pixels in the images and their 
corresponding locations on the ground is known. Thus, the 
determination of the exterior orientation parameters of these 
time-dependent linear images is the most important problem to 
be solved firstly. In this paper we provided several orientation 
strategies to improve the accuracy of point determination with 
minimum number ground control points. These strategies have 
been practically applied in STARIMAGER. 
References 
Chen, T., and R. Shibasaki, 2001. Development and Calibration 
of Airborne Three-Line Scanner (TLS) Imaging System, Report 
on TLS System of STARLABO, IIS, University of Tokyo, 
Tokyo, Japan, 10 April. 
Christensen, E.J., J.R. Jensen, E.W. Ramsey, H.E. Mackley, 
1988. Aircraft MSS data registration and vegetation 
classification for wetland change detection, Photogrammetric 
Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 53, No. 5 pp. 521-529. 
Donald, L. L, 1996. Film Cameras or Digital Sensors ? The 
Challenge Ahead for Aerial Imaging, Photogrammetric 
Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 285-291. 
Lee C., H. J. Theiss, J. S. bethel, and E. M. Mikhail, 2000. 
Rigorous Mathematical Modeling of Airborne Pushbroom 
Imaging Systems, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote 
Sensing, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 385-392. 
Strunk, S., J. McMacken, S. Kamasz, W. Washkurak, F. Ma, and 
S. Chamberlain, 1992. The Development of a Four Million Pixel 
CCD Imager for Aerial Reconnaissance, Proceedings of the 
International Society for Optical Engineering, Airborne 
Reconnaissance XVI, SPIE, 1763:25-36. 
Toth, C., 1998. Direct Platform Orientation of Multi-Sensor 
Data Acquisition Systems, Proceedings of ISPRS Congress 
Committee 1V, Stuttgart, pp. 629-634. 
    
TOV 
* Dep 
5 Di 
KEY WORDS: Fi 
ABSTRACT: 
This paper summa 
orientation and reg 
with methods acc 
optimization frame 
Photogrammetry (] 
secondly to presen 
this project is just 
developed for fram 
Feature-Based Pho 
active field of rese 
(traditional) analy 
primitives employe 
in traditional phot 
points are exclusi 
orientation and e 
photogrammetry a 
dimensional featur 
made features in th 
means that no pric 
object space and it 
entire linear feature 
in an appropriate 
correspondence is 
employed feature-b 
Over the years m 
accommodating lin 
photogrammetric t: 
2000, Zalmanson, 2 
their vision aimed 
more accurate, rol 
central arguments 
autonomous envirc 
easily and reliabl 
addition, typical aei 
roads, buildings, c 
appear in some reac 
that can be used 
  
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.