International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004 
REN TUT 
  
  
  
  
Figure 3. Non-standard configuration of the block 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 1 
3 Flight 
Block Camera Flight Focal Strips Photos Breaks d 
number scale distance 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 
] LMK 12800 152.440 12 233 + W-E 
2 RC-30 4300 305.117 3 24 - W-E 
3 LMK 9500 152.440 35 322 + W-E 
4 LMK 6000 153.478 3 19 - S-N 
5 RMK-TOP 10000 153.619 2 16 - S-N 
6 RMK 20000 152.850 29 395 + N-S 
  
  
The special feature of second block was numerous forest 
areas. GCPs were well distributed but measurement was quite 
difficult due to the forest areas. 
Third block (Picture 3) has very complex configuration 
including several breaks. Ground control points and 
projection centers were used for adjustment. Although the 
block was computed successfully it is recommended to make 
deep analysis before deciding to use any non-standard 
configured blocks. 
656 
Small fourth block located in mountain area where ratio of 
terrain height to flight height reached 0.15. 
Block number five is covered a flat area were maximum 
height difference is just 7 meters. 
Adjustment results are shown in table 2. It estimates blocks” 
accuracy by residuals of co-linearity on ground and 
photogrammetric points. 
Inter 
Bloc] 
than 
As sl 
gives 
meas 
10. € 
The 
many 
produ 
excee 
less tl 
Devel 
proce. 
the ac 
Real-{ 
adjust 
adjust 
Refer 
1. Zot 
points 
[APR! 
Austri 
2. Nel 
tools f 
Paper 
Istanbı 
3. Ne 
collect 
mappit 
IV, An 
4. Ant 
Oleyni 
time. I