anbul 2004
NTATION
FRAMES
rity model,
Eq. 4 to a
itions. The
orm as:
Jes, and
and
he vector
and Jj:
; 4nx3n
unctions in
orientation
1) is the
the image
quence to
frame was
he camera
lated using
ve pairs of
ra station,
Eq. 5 for
vw
(6)
e exterior
s follows:
zl e
—
ast image
NTATION
FRAMES
frame, the
*P of three
inimum of
using two
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004
camera orientations of the previous image frames. The
calculation of the GCP of the optical flows is as follows:
X X, Lu LU
Y-Y .Q,225 Me iP.
XXe, C
2(Z,-Z, AME ATE,
Wa
Y —
i Y
where U -myx;tm,y,tm,f
V mox t HV, tmo
W=m,x, + m,,y; + my, f . The GCP is found with the aid
of the classical least-squares solution.
>
IX. 2. ZV (fy 4D, (8)
Le À ~-U,_,/W,_,
Q d «E nm.
where A= Er and
10 -U,/W,
0-1 > V. "nm
X502 = 2 30 IW, 2
Y, =2 Z, e. IW,
= "T ED T . If Eq. 6 is given at
Xa = Zr ite /W, |
Yi = ZA fW
least three GCPs, the camera orientation is calculated as
follows:
NEN ep (9)
After a few iterations of Eq. 10, we can determine the exterior
orientation of the camera from the third image frame to the last
image frame as follows:
= = es E I
lo, 9, K, X Li Y Z, of F = lai % K, A y Zi of = A
4. MULTI-BASELINES FOR CREATING VIDEO
MOSAICS
As stated above, the 2D-image mosaic technique projects all
of image frames on a single baseline to create an image with
wide range. Since it can’t be applied to image frames taken
from a rotating camera, to solve the drawback, this paper
proposes a novel method for creating image mosaics in 3-D
space in case of using an image sequence taken from a
translating and rotating camera.
729
Q Feature point
Verres
siurod o1nuay
Jo yıdap 3Se.10AV
=
Object ;
Baseline -————-—-7- ;
„Image plane z——
(c)
Fig. 2. Independent baselines by using camera pose and
average depth of feature points per image frame.
The core of the proposed method is determining dependent
baseline to per image frame for creating multi-baselines on
which all of image frames are projected. The pose of the
baseline of image frame is the same pose of camera. The
perpendicular distance between camera focus and baseline is
evaluated as the average distance of optical flows like Fig. 2(a).
the spatial transform of optical flows from the world coordinate
to the coordinate of image plane is following as:
zr x, Y,
FET. Zu ists EM dx X ZA
(10)
Where (X,,
pose. Since the pose of baseline is the same pose of image plane,
in case of Fig. 2(b), the multi-baselines are the thick dot-lines.
In case that each image frames are projected on itself baseline,
the result will be Fig. 2(c).
Y,,Z,) is camera station and (c, , &) is camera
4.1 THE MODIFICATION OF FAULT BASELINE
From now, this section only describes the modification of
multi-baseline in XZ coordination as compensating the reverse
image rotation of x axis to itself image frame. Since the case of
Fig. 2(b) based on a camera of which the image motion is the 5
DOF, (7 5115/7: 9, 7); with. the exception of the image
rotation of x axis, a. is an ideal state, it is able to create video
mosaics in 3D space. In most instances, the motion of a camera
has 6 DOF including the image rotation of y axis which is one
of the difficult things to create video mosaics like Fig. 3(a) and
Fig. 4. Therefore there are needed to modify the baseline like
Fig. 3(b) and Fig. 5.