Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004 
    
S 
PS 
m 
RN 
Zi 
Za 
Figure 1: Sketches of the five image configuration. Upper row - configurations with strong image geometry: "Tetra, 
'Airl^ and "Air2'. Lower row - configurations with weak image geometry: "Street1' and 'Street2'. The arrows point in 
direction of the cuboid compression, the limit of which is represented by the small bar. The camera geometry for "Tetra, 
'Street1? and. "Street2! is based on the Nikon DCS460; i.e. 3000 x 2000 pizels (9 jum) with principal distance of 3500 pixel. 
The camera geometry for ’Air1’ and ’Air2” is based on the aerial normal angle case; i.e. image size 23x23 cn? , assumed 
to be scanned with 15 pm, and principal distance 300 mm. 
is computed by the five methods mentioned above. From 
the computed tensor projection matrices are extracted fol- 
lowing [Hartley 1997], which are then used to determine 
all no points into object space by spatial intersection. This 
results in a projective, not a Euclidian, reconstruction of 
all no points. Using the known Euclidian object coor- 
dinates of the k sample points a transformation M be- 
tween the projective reconstruction and the true Euclidian 
space can be computed. With M the other no — k points 
are also transformed from the projective reconstruction to 
the Euclidian space and the mean and maximum differ- 
ences (termed ground errors) between the transformed and 
known Euclidian positions are determined. 
These steps are repeated for 1000 samples and the overall 
mean of the mean and maximum ground errors are stored. 
Then the cuboid is compressed in a certain direction and 
the whole process is repeated for the thinner cuboid. The 
overall means of the mean and maximum ground errors are 
then plotted against the compression rate of the cuboid; 
see figure 2 (left part) which shows the plot for the "Tetra'- 
configuration and 8 point correspondences. 
For each image configuration a threshold for the mean 
ground error was set. If this threshold is hurt by the mean 
ground error of a certain sample, the number of failures 
for the respective pair (image configuration and cuboid 
compression) is increased by 1. After all 1000 samples the 
percentage of failures are also plotted against the cuboid 
compression; see figure 2 (right part). 
Due to the space limitation only the plot for the image con- 
figuration ’Tetra’ and 8 corresponding points is included 
in this article. For a detailed description of these synthetic 
experiments with all respective plots see [Ress] 2003]. The 
results found there can be summarized in the following 
way: 
e The ground errors obtained for the different compu- 
tation methods tend to be the same 
for a particular image configuration, if the num- 
ber of point correspondences increases, and 
for a particular number of point correspondence, 
if the stability of the image geometry increases. 
Therefore, from 10 points onwards for Tetra’, Air?’ 
and 'Air2", and from 25 points onwards for '"Streetl 
and 'Street2', all computation methods return prac- 
tically the same result; i.c. then the simple direct lin- 
ear solution ('"UCA") is equivalent to the rigorous con- 
strained computation (CR!) minimizing reprojection 
error. 
e For small numbers of point correspondences, € 8 for 
the stable configurations "Tetra', 'Airl? and 'Air2' and 
for the unstable configurations 'Streetl' and ‘Street?’ 
in general, the unconstrained minimization of repro- 
jection error generally performed better than any al- 
gebraic (constrained or unconstrained) minimization. 
Therefore, the benefit of minimizing only reprojection 
error, is larger than of considering only the constraints. 
e Concerning the impact of the minimum thickness of 
the cuboid on the various computation methods, we 
can say that 
  
  
   
   
  
      
    
  
  
   
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
   
  
  
  
  
    
  
    
  
   
   
    
  
   
    
  
  
  
  
    
    
  
International Ar 
ETC 
Figure 2: Plo 
camera distanc 
ground error u 
ford 
ie." 
ness 
tion 
for le 
— for ir 
’Stre 
large 
the ı 
ation 
cant 
of po 
also ; 
e Depending 
the compu 
cessful for 
in table 1; 
cuboid cor 
smaller th: 
age of failt 
next it is n 
lies somew 
4 EXPERI 
The findings of 
cally most relev 
could be used : 
thickness of ab 
10 point corres 
could be the fa 
The Institute o 
Vienna created 
cameras by stic 
of their inner c
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.