nbul 2004
according
)
—(1)
v2
- Ha)
| window
ndow
nding part
ng part of
reference
orrelation.
n can be
1 between
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004
e the estimation process is efficient,
e the evaluation tools from least squares estimation are
available.
Feature based matching uses symbolic descriptions of the
images for establishing correspondence. It is assumed that such
a symbolic description can replace the original image suitably
well and all information that is necessary for matching is
contained in the attributes of the features and possibly their
relations. Using features instead of the original intensities
permits to select a representation that is much more invariant
with respect to distortions such as illumination, reflectance or
geometry (Lang and Fórstner 1998).
4. EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS
Ten photographs, which belonged to Selcuk University Campus
area, were taken by Wild RC 10 camera. Fig.5 shows
subimages and locations of fiducial marks for Wild RC 10
camera. Table 1 shows calibrated data of fiducial marks for
Wild RC 10 camera. The focal length is 153.29 mm and
photographs scale is 1:10000. The films were scanned by Zeiss
Scai Photogrammetric Scanner. They were scanned with a pixel
size of 21 pm, 8 bits per pixel, yielding a ground resolution
21.0 cm. Total scanned image size is 10956 pixel*10955 pixel.
Figure 5. Subimage and locations of fiducial marks for Wild RC
10 camera
Table 1. Calibrated data of fiducial marks for Wild RC 10
camera
Fiducial Calibrated data of fiducial marks
marks
x(mm) y(mm)
1 -106.007 106.004
2 106.009 106.005
3 106.005 -106.002
E- 4 -106.007 -106.004
A computer program in Borland C++ Builder software is
developed to find out the image fiducial marks, particularly for
this project. The program has manual and automatic interior
orientation module, bundle adjustment module and automatic
digital elevation module (Karabork 2002).
Cross correlation matching method is used for measuring of
fiducial marks (Fig.6). Four fiducial marks on each image in
this project are automatically measured by cross correlation.
Both residuals of fiducial marks on each image (Table.2) and
root mean square error of transformation between pixel and
image coordinate system are calculated.
Input Reference Search
P» Window P Window
Generation Generation
Transformation Determination Cross
«| ofbest fit pixel |g Correlation
Figure 6. Workflow of interior orientation
Table.2 Residuals of fiducial marks on each image
Fiducial No
Image No 1 2 3 4
9061 v, (pixel)| 0.30 -0.30 0.30 -0.30
vy (pixel)| -0.01 0.01 -0.01 0.01
9062 v. (pixel)| 0.30 -0.30 0.30 -0.30
vy (pixel)| -0.01 0.01 -0.01 0.01
9063 V, (pixel)| 0.30 -0.30 0.30 -0.30
v, (pixel)| -0.01 0.01 -0.01 0.01
9064 v, (pixel) | 0.30 -0.30 0.30 -0.30
vy (pixel)| -0.01 0.01 -0.01 0.01
9065 v, (pixel)| 0.30 -0.30 0.30 -0.30
v, (pixel)| 0.24 -0.24 0.24 -0.24
9066 v, (pixel)| 0.55 -0.55 0.55 -0.55
v, (pixel)| -0.26 0.26 -0.26 0.26
9067 v, (pixel)| 0.30 -0.30 0.30 -0.30
vy (pixel) 0.49 -0.49 0.49 -0.49
9068 v, (pixel)| 0.30 -0.30 0.30 -0.30
vy (pixel)| 0.24 -0.24 0.24 | -0.24
9069 v, (pixel)| 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
vy (pixel)| -0.01 0.01 -0.01 0.01
9070 v, (pixel)| 0.54 -0.54 0.54 -0.54
v, (pixel)! 0.49 -0.49 0.49 -0.49
813
In addition, interior orientation of 10 images are manually
achieved by Erdas Imagine Orthobase software. Both residuals
of fiducial marks on each image and root mean square error of
transformation between pixel and image coordinate system are
manually calculated. Finally, both manual and automatic
measurement techniques are compared with each other in terms
of interior orientation accuracy (Table 3).