nbul 2004
»equential
One of the
simulation
g directly
in a 10m
x) and the
ation and
collocated
immarized
natrix and
part in the
ie. Landsat
umber of
ated using
s primary
;, the high-
secondary
coefficient
ned in a
simulated
andsat and
:h band;
iping them
ning 30m
andsat TM
d Landsat-
resampled
nal image.
selected as
simulated
on. In that
esents the
30 x 30m
Isat-TM is
yndition. In
nal images
!
ıl checking
ocess is 10
simulation.
correlation
n this case,
be adjusted
the 30 m
rresponding
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV. Part B4 Istanbul 2004
m
en
SPOT-P
GSD-10m
LANDSAT-TM
(PAN GSD-30m
(TM)
Statistics
Variogram
| Correlation Matrix
. Direct Sequential Cosimulation
Additional Co-DSS
simulations
1
f| COSIMULATED |
- TM-PAN |
GSD=10m |
(TM-PAN10) |
Resampling
10.000 simulated BI COSIMULATED |
images : TM-PAN |
GSD-30m
(TM-PAN30)
TM-PAN30 = TM?
|
No simulation |
TM=TM-PAN30 | i
> 1 simulation
TM=TM-PAN
i
1 simulation
TM=TM-PAN
|
|
Version with maximum 2
| local correlation is selected
* TM-PAN vs TM
PIXEL ACCEPTED
| Local correction
*
FINAL
M IMAGE
fl LANDSAT-TM
SPOT-P
GSD-10m |
Figure 2. General schema of the proposed method
3. EXAMPLE
3.1 Geographical localization
To show the capabilities of the proposed method, a complete
application example is shown. The selected zone covers a
2400mx2400m area localized in the Jaén province (S of
Spain), near of Jaén city. The area presents several land-uses
oe olive trees, riverside vegetation, roads, etc.) (Figure
897
Alcalá la Real
Figure 3. Localization map
3.2 Images
The data set used for this application is composed of a
portion the following images:
l. LandsatTM images. Scene: 20034/95. Date:
08/26/1995. Image size: 80x80 pixels. GSD=30m
(TM6 band has not been considered).
2. SPOT-P image. Scene: 35-274/0-P. Date:
06/01/1995. Image size: 240x240 pixels.
GSD=10m.
Both images were obtained on similar dates in order to
ensure the merging process quality. In Figure 4a and Figure
4b, SPOT-P and TM543 RGB composition is shown.
3.3 Basic statistics and Correlation Matrix
The basic statistics of the different bands and matrix
correlation is presented in Table 1.
Image Mean Std.Dev. Minimum Maximum
TMI 99.10 15.00 66 166
TM2 51.65 10.17 26 97
TM3 67.37 14.66 28 131
TM4 74. 99 14.37 34 133
TMS 123.56 27.62 45 226
TM7 66.67 16.77 22 139
SPOT-P 140.58 25.74 63 254
TM! TM2 TM3 TM4 IMS TM7 PAN
TMI- 1.00 09% 090 034 085 081 083
TM2 1.000 097 090 03838 087 0.83
TM3 — 100 0901 089 0.90 0.82
TM4 1.00 083 0.85 0.74
TMS 1.00... 097 0.72
TM7 1.00. 0.70
PAN 1.00
Table 1. Basic Statistics and Correlation matrix
(PAN image is considered resampled to 30m pixel size)