Sus 70 T T T T T T T T "1 
iwood. eT 
table. m | 
D 65 | X82. mo 
= ¥s3. Om 
Ls oO 
60 + 3 
0 
CD 
SS ab C irt 
S + 
g 
"m 
U 
45 + + 
a où 
40 r OH 
o od 
oo oo 
2000 wo © + + ++ 
35$ ++ E d 
+ 9 + = 
30 - chu | 
4r a 
d 
25 B J 
20 L i 1 1 L 1 1 i 
0 orum 0:2 0,3 0.4 055 0.6 0:7 0-8 0.9 
Sd*cosI 
vood and 
Figure 2. Digital counts of selected hardwood pixels in various shaded relief Sz; in different XS bands. 
  
  
  
  
— 0. 12 I T T T T T T T 
taua0-0.1 9 
taua0 + 
taua0+0.1 O 
p. qe a 
2 0.08 F - 
2 
e 
d o 
1J ed 
9 0.06 > = 
ES! 
ud 
x 
9o 
0.04 1 E 
o 
XN o o od 
+ oo 
tel ++ + 
T tal 
0.02 r gu ae ++ 7 
0 
a (oy 
cn an 
0s 1 cost 1 1 gu 1 1 1 
0 0.3 0.2 03 0.4 029 0.6 Q7 0.8 0.9 
Sd*cosi 
Figure 3. Relationship of hardwood reflectance to shaded relief S14 with 
optimized aerosol optical depth 7,0 and 7,0+0.01 in XS1 band. 
111 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996