Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 5)

    
   
   
  
   
   
  
   
  
   
    
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
  
    
  
  
   
   
   
   
  
  
    
  
   
    
  
     
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
   
  
    
     
  
    
    
   
    
  
   
    
   
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
     
ul 2004 
and the 
racy are 
; models 
ration of 
g model 
larity of 
mer and 
ted for 
ime was 
accurate 
Zunming 
ime(sec) 
196.64 
128.61 
ne with 
is can be 
' because 
ition and 
because 
s in each 
of its less 
industrial 
MIMGIS 
ninimum 
un on the 
Is in the 
ortant for 
criterion 
this case 
omparing 
termined. 
industrial 
hed based 
arameter. 
good (B), 
0 experts 
1s A (0.7- 
omparing 
itus, each 
incorrect 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004 
Table 3. Evaluation results for models accuracy 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Status Location Index Overlay | Fuzzy Sum 
Estate Status | Status Evaluation Status Evaluation 
Rajaee A A * A + 
Salimi B B + A - 
Saeed 
B B * A i 
Abad 
Status Location Fwzyy Genetic 
Rajace A B - B - 
Salımi B B + C z 
Saeed 
B C - C - 
Abad 
  
  
  
  
  
It is seen in Table 3, that Index Overlay has better accuracy 
than other models. Therefore, we propose Index Overlay as an 
optimum model for industrial estates site selection. 
3.7 Finding Optimum Location for Industrial Estates in 
Study Area 
With respect to models evaluation result, optimum location for 
new industrial estate construction can be located by analyzing 
Index Overlay output map (Figure 4). 
    
    
[ Joonvenient sites 
& City 
; 3 industrial estat 
5: 8 Index evetlay resolts 
23 0.0 
  
Figure 4. Finding optimum location for new industrial estate 
According to Figure 4, convenient sites have been represented 
by yellow area and the maximum appropriateness (0.9). They 
are potential areas that decision must be made on them based on 
their priority (Table 4). 
Table 4. Potential sites properties 
  
  
  
  
  
; Distance Form ; 
Sites Area (km^2 a 
\rea (km^2) Tabrize (km) Loction f 
North-west of 
1 2.72 ; 
7 Hi Tabriz 
2 3.59 17 None oi 
Tabriz 
  
  
  
  
Based on table 4, it is identified that Site no. 1 has better 
economic, accessing and facilities conditions than site no. 2, 
because it is nearer to Tabriz. Price of land is also cheaper in 
site no. 1 than that of site no. 2. Therefore, we propose site 
no.] as an optimum site around Tabriz for new industrial estate 
construction. 
4 CONCLUSIONS 
Land use mapping is a convenient tool for optimum 
relationships adjusting between humans activities and 
environment effects that is used for logical resources utilizing 
and managing. Optimum site selection is an important problem 
for industrial goals that is related to industrial land use 
mapping. Industrial estates site selection is one of the industrial 
goals that is very important for each country industrial 
development. Therefore, in this case study we tried to prove 
that GIS is able to work as an efficient decision making tool for 
industrial land use mapping problems by successful running and 
implementing industrial estates site selection models. For this 
purpose, first, we selected a study area at the north-west of Iran 
and evaluated different integration models by entering effective 
criteria and factors and running models in GIS environment. 
Finally, by executing optimum model we found optimum 
location for industrial estate construction. 
Weighting of factor maps is very important in site selection 
process that output results accuracy depends on its correct 
defining. 
By checking different integration models, it was identified that 
Index Overlay, Fuzzy Sum, Fuzzy y and Genetic models can be 
used for industrial estates site selection, although, Index 
Overlay has optimum running time and output accuracy 
comparing with other models. 
5 REFRENCES 
References from Journals: 
An, P., Moon, W.M., 1991. “Application of Fuzzy Set Theory 
for Integration of Geological, Geophysical and Remote Sensing 
Data.", Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics,Chapter 
27; PP. 1-11: 
Royce, W.W., 1970. *Managing the Development of Large 
Software Systems.", Proceeding IEEE Wescon, PP. 1-9. 
References from Books: 
Aronof, S. 1989. Geographic Information Systems: A 
Management Perspective, Ottawa, Canada: WDL Publications. 
Bonham Carter and G.F., 1991. Geographic Information System 
for Geoscientists: Modelling with GIS, Pergamon, Ontario, PP. 
319-470. 
Demers, M.D., 1992. Fundamental of Geographic Information 
System, Chapter 16, PP. 389-401. 
Gen, M., 1997. Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Design, 
John Wiley, Newyork, PP. 5-63. 
Poladdezh, M., 1997. Site selection for industrial projects, 
Tehran, Iran, Chapter 4. 
Zimmermann, H.J. and Zayo, P., 1980. Latent Connectives in 
Human Decision Making: Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Chapter 4: 
PP. 37-3]. 
  
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.