nbul 2004 International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004
TI
ee Le
um
ate (result
he goal of
cal in that
ings. This
je to the
limestone
nks at the
out 28 m.
There are six projecting sections with five recesses. Inside these structure-from-motion approaches, which tend to use video
recesses, the podium is only about 1 m wide, whereas the two
outside parts project appr. 4 m, while the width at the four
central parts is appr. 2 m. During the course of its history
the building has been partly dismantled, repaired, and modified,
probably because of an earlier earthquake.
As part of these changes, the socle mouldings in the niches were
partly removed to make room for sculptures and pedestals
inside, which the original podium width of ca. 0.4 m would not
have allowed. The central curved niche, crowned by a fluted
concha, had one projecting console in its upper part from which
the water fell in a cascade to fill a basin of 81 m^ capacity.
Excess water flowed over the top of the basin, where it could be
collected in jars. The larger lateral aediculae each held four
columns in two rows, the other aediculae held only a single row
of columns. The monolithic columns, about 3.35 m high, had
Attic-Ionic bases and Corinthian capitals. They carried an
entablature of architrave and frieze blocks, and a cornice. These
six aediculae supported richly decorated pediments. The
pediments of the lateral aediculae had a double S-shaped outline
decorated with opposed volutes, while those on either side of
the central niche were curved and decorated with Gorgoneia
(Medusa heads). The second and fifth pediment were triangular
with a similar decoration. Inside, the aediculae were roofed with
large horizontal slabs, with coffers decorated with theatre
masks, heads of mythological figures, or floral motifs. The
height of the nymphaeum was ca. 7 m in the niches and 7.8 m
in the aediculae. A total of 17 different materials (different
types of breccia, limestone, and marble) were combined into a
splendour of natural colors.
The virtual reconstruction was based on
I. expertise of the archaeological team concerning the
architectural style of the period (the determination of
which is supported by archaeological evidence) and of
the region
2. photographs of the remains of the building
3. architectural drawings of the building, produced as part
of the documentation of the excavations and of the
preparation of the building's anastylosis. These were
made with the help of a total station.
4. 3D reconstructions of parts, using both passive and
active techniques
5. textures, synthesised on the basis of sample images of
intact material
6. comparison with contemporary monuments elsewhere
The reconstruction intends to reflect the state of the building
around the middle of the seventh century AD. Excavations on
the nymphaeum started in 1994. More than 90% of the building
elements have been found, albeit more often than not in a
seriously damaged state. The finds hàve been documented
through a large set of photographs and drawings.
2.2 Shape-from-stills
This already allowed us to build some reconstructions directly
from the photographic material based on our ‘shape-from-stills’
pipeline (Van Gool, 2002). It needs as its input a series of
sufficiently overlapping photographs, from which it
automatically extracts the camera parameters and positions, as
well as the 3D structure of the photographed object. It can be
considered to be a generalisation of the self-calibrating
data. (Pollefeys, 2002) Not only is the acquisition of stills
typically easier, the images can have far higher resolution,
which then translates into higher 3D model quality. The price
that one has to pay is that wide-baseline correspondences need
to be found, which is a much harder problem than the usual
tracking of features between consecutive video frames. We also
found it necessary to systematically take radial distortions into
account.
2.3 1-shot, structured light
Apart from this ‘passive’ 3D extraction technique, we also used
Eyetronics' ShapeCam (Eyetronics, 2004). This structured light
device was used for some of the highly decorated elements,
where the geometry could be quite intricate (e.g. for part of the
statuary). This system is shown in fig. 4.
Figure 4: Top: The ShapeCam system consists of a flash
projecting a grid and a camera. The camera takes an image
from a direction that is slightly different from the direction of
projection. Bottom: A regular square pattern is projected on the
scene, as seen in this detailed view. 3D co-ordinates are
calculated for all the line intersections, resulting in the
simultaneous measurement for thousands of points.
An early version of this system had originally been developed in
our computer vision lab in Leuven. A grid is projected onto the
object by the use of a flash, simultaneously an image is taken,
and from the grid's deformation in the image, a complete
surface patch is reconstructed in 3D. In both cases — shape-
from-stills and the ShapeCam — the apparatus is easy to carry
around. As a matter of fact, the camera that is part of the
ShapeCam can also be used to take the input for the shape-
from-stills technique. From the point of view of the
archaeologists, 3D shape extraction only requires taking images
with a normal camera.