Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 5)

    
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
   
  
   
   
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
   
  
   
  
  
     
  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004 
  
he was not allowed to erect permanent signal structures, 
because those were often removed on purpose. Thus, in order 
not to attract attention, he marked the places using small posts 
on the ground level or a piece of iron in the rocks. During the 
measurements his five or six helpers set a purpose-built vertical 
signal pole on the assigned location and guarded it until the 
operation - as he called surveying - was finished. For 
communication with his assistants Pfyffer used a big flag in 
black and white. From time to time he was also forced to use 
natural points such as single tall firs as signals; in this case he 
considered the displacement of the station during the 
subsequent angle measurements at the concerned position. We 
can conclude that in the time when surveying was not (yet) a 
state- or military-supported enterprise but rather a cause for 
suspicion, Pfyffer solved the problems of missing immovable 
signal structures by means of good preparation and organization 
of his work. 
Pfyffer ordered his surveying equipment and accessories at 
various places in Europe. To prove the procedures and the 
accuracy of his instruments to measure angles, he measured at 
each station with several different pieces of equipment. As a 
practitioner he was at most fond of a plane table and a 
graphometer, both instruments which could deliver the 
graphical results immediately in the field. Pfyffer constructed 
some surveying instruments himself, too, such as the alidade 
with a telescope and two diopters in combination with a plane 
table (Fig. 8 right). The most precise instrument of Pfyffer was 
a simple English theodolite which he called /e chassis, the 
frame (Fig. 8 left). It was a stable, 2 feet high device with a 
horizontal and a vertical circle, both divided in degrees and 
minutes. Instead of a telescope the instrument was provided 
with two peep sight diopters. The major difference of this 
"frame" in comparison with his other instruments was that it did 
not allow the underlying with a piece of paper for graphical 
interpretation. It belonged to a new generation of instruments 
coming from England, which supplied the surveyor only with 
the numerical values whereas the abandonment of drawing 
accessories made them more compact and more accurate. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Fig. 8: Two instruments reconstructed according to Pfyffer's 
description: left an ancestor of a present theodolite, right the 
alidade with a telescope in combination with a planar table. 
The results of numerical analysis using statistical and image 
processing procedures allowed for coming to a new interesting 
conclusion concerning Pfyffer's triangulation. As shown in 
Table 1, the deviation of the relief and the analysed maps from 
the northern direction amounts to peculiar numbers (around 30 
and 15.5 degrees), while the orientation of Pfyffer's manuscript 
map of Central Switzerland at a scale of about 1:247'000 is 
almost perfectly northern. What motivated Pfyffer to orient his 
major topographic works in such an unusual manner? At the 
end of the 18th century the northern orientation of small-scaled 
maps became widely accepted and on the other hand, large 
scale maps still kept an arbitrary orientation according to the 
position and form of the territory to be mapped. However, the 
latter could not be the reason for Pfyffer who himself depicted 
the same area in a north-oriented manuscript drawing (Fig. 4). 
The answer to this question can be found when looking at the 
secular variations of the geomagnetic field of the Earth for over 
400 years. On the basis of the old measurements we can 
recognize a steady progressive change in magnetic declination, 
or angle between magnetic north and geographic north. The 
publication of (Fischer, 1994) shows that between 1740 and 
1790 the westerly declination in Central Switzerland varied 
from 15° to 19° with a value of about 15.5° for 1750. Thus, 
Pfyffer oriented his large-scaled topographic works - including 
the inner constructional parts of the relief - simply according to 
his compass (Fig. 9). Since Pfyffer's measurements took place 
within a long time span and over a large area, changes of 
magnetic declination certainly had a negative influence on the 
accuracy of his results. To eliminate these errors, repeated and 
precise astronomic measurements would have to be undertaken, 
and this was by Pfyffer probably not the case. 
  
15.299 
   
(b) Georeferenced 
map of Clausner 
(a) Georeferenced Pfyffer's 
map of the Rengg area 
^ 
     
    
30.30? 
15,5? 
  
  
(d) Georeferenced 
Pfyffer's Relief 
(c) Georeferenced inner 
parts of Pfyffer's Relief 
  
  
  
Fig. 9: Orientation of Pfyffer's works, corresponding with the 
westerly declination of magnetic north (a-c) The original 
declination of the relief was 15.5? (c). Later on, Pfyffer must 
have decided - probably for political reasons - to add new 
constructional parts under a different angle so that the whole 
relief deviates about 30? from geographic north (c, d). 
Pfyffer's surveying was performed before the theory of errors 
and least squares adjustment had been elaborated. He strived 
for accuracy in terms of possibly small deviation of the angle 
sum in a triangle from 180?. His observations were always 
excessive and thus they enabled the elimination of insecure 
directions and also a simple averaging of error-afflicted 
measurements. When content with the triangulation, Pfyffer 
turned to the detailed measurements. He mapped all the 
significant terrain objects with his plane table: ways and paths, 
rivers and small streams, houses, meadows, hedges, ravines and 
even big stones. He also differentiated oak, beech and fir 
forests. Under bad weather conditions he transferred the 
recorded sheets to a large-scaled map and hereafter he began to 
construct the relief. —— 
   
Inter 
een 
33 
The 
pione 
The | 
centu 
How 
area- 
syste 
of hi 
Clau 
Pfyfl 
barol 
eleve 
the b 
evide 
meas 
of h 
relie: 
the 
open 
valu 
grea 
of P 
that 
meas 
enab 
8) in 
for t 
alpir 
with 
firstl 
have 
of tl 
Supp 
how 
prob 
Pfyf 
heig 
(428 
the i 
mea 
term 
prog 
The 
cons 
mea 
Luci 
iden 
pres 
amo 
cont 
to bi 
the - 
clea 
aver 
m, i 
Sout 
Pfyf 
the 
one 
relie 
iden
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.