International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004
3.3.1 Estimating the Site catchment of Karekinomiya
Settlement
The same procedure used in the Shingu settlement is applied to
estimate the catchment (Figure 12).
Time
RE Hish : 20299157 kilometers
i Lows 1 0000000 L j
Figure 12. The estimated site catchment of Karekinomiya
settlement
3.3.2 Environment within the Catchment Area of
Karekinomiya Settlement
The same procedure used in the Shingu settlement is applied to
calculate the percentage of environmental factor per unit area
(Figure 13).
—+-—base of
mountain
78 gravel
plateau
natural
levee
deltaic
lowland
—+— Mudflat
0-20 20-40 40-60 60-80 80-100 100-120
Figure 13. Graph shows the percentage of environmental factor
per unit area (Karekinomiya settlement).
Again, the graph indicates the turning point of surrounding
environments at around 50 minutes walk from the settlement. The
graph indicates that the peak of accessible deltaic lowland is
around the 50 minutes walk from the settlement. Also, the
percentage of gravel plateau and mudflat is inverted around the
threshold of 50 minutes. Especially, increase of the gravel plateau
after the 50 minutes threshold is significant. The result implies the
existence of marshy landscape at area below the threshold, and
comparatively dry landscape at area above the threshold. It is
reasonable to assume the existence of different way of land
utilization according to the environmental difference.
3.3.3 Activities held in Karekinomiya Settlement
The significant characteristic of the site is the existence of shell
mound and uncovered natural remains (i.e. animal bones and
fish bones). + shell mound and bones implies that the food
gathering activity of Karekinomiya was emphasized on the
fishery and hunting. In fact, the composition of the uncovered
artifacts supports this hypothesis. Stone arrowhead, stone
spearhead, and stone sinker have been uncovered from the site,
while grinding set did not. According to the excavation report
(Education Board of Nishio, 1981), most of the animal bones
were of the animals which habitats in forest area.
3.4 Reconstructing the Karekinomiya Settlement and
Surrounding Environment
Same procedures used for Shingu settlement was adapted for
reconstructing the vegetation, and for visualization (Figure 14),
The land utilization of Karekinomiya settlement was considered
based on the graph (Figure 13) and the CG (Figure 14). The
land use of catchment can be estimated as coast area for fishery,
and other area as hunting site. Especially around the border of
the marshy condition and dry condition, which is around 50 min
threshold can be important for the hunting site.
Open Forest Natural Forest
Settlement Secondary Forest
0 min
oas Lowland
|
Figure 14. The environment inside catchment area and its
spatial structure referred with the corresponding
food-gathering activities (Karekinomiya site).
Hunting |
3.5 Comparing Shingu Settlement and Karekinomiya
Settlement from the Viewpoint of Environmental
Endurance
Shingu site and Karekinomiya site were contemporary
settlements (i.e. first half of the latest stage of Jomon period).
But only Shingu site survived the next later half of the last stage.
It is known that some other settlements have perished after the
first half of the latest stage as same as Karekinomiya site. One
of the leading hypothesises is the influence of the dropping of
temperature and relating sea level change occurred in this stage.
Excavation reports explains that there was an increase of pinus
and the decrease of Quercus, which implies a dropping
temperature and influence to the vegetation. On the other hand,
Koumura (1983) pointed out that the marine regression of about
3m decrease in sea level is expected, and the environmental
changes have severely influenced the life of the Jomon people.
The marine regression is estimated by thresholding the DEM by
sea level (Figure 15).
VY
=
a (34
Figure 15. Change of the coast line and its distance from the
Karekinomiya settlement
The catchment analysis shows the regression of coast line to
near the border of the 50 minutes threshold. Simply the time
cost has doubled for the people to reach the coast.
Inte
—
Visu
the cl
Figut
Figu
Thei
dista
harm
disat
that
livin
the |
locat
peric
from
envil
and
4.1
The
acti
spati
resul
inter
intes
The
com
that
of f
the
utili:
Ever
sury